Showing posts with label America Lost. Show all posts
Showing posts with label America Lost. Show all posts
Sunday, October 6, 2013
How Does Insurance Payee Match Up with Claims of Ownership of the Loan?
by Neil Garfield
There have been many admissions by government officials and even parties to the litigation over mortgage Foreclosures to the effect that at this point the ownership of most loans is in doubt. Even President Obama said it, reflecting the views and advice of the senior advisors at the White House. On appeal, recently in California, BOTH sides admitted they had no way of identifying the true creditor --- and that is why we have all this litigation, why we have gridlock on modifications and settlements. So what do we do?
One insurance expert I interviewed suggested that his industry might solve the problem, but I think his points raise more questions than answers. Nonetheless, to prove the question, and overcome certain presumptions that are legally applied, examining the insurance policies and the changes that occur in forced placed insurance might reveal the issues and even illuminate the potential solution.
Bank of America is an example of a bank that rushes to take any excuse to place insurance from their own carrier BalBOA, naming BOA as the loss payee on liability policies. The usual previous loss payee was someone else --- perhaps the originator or some alleged assignee. The procedure of forced placed insurance creates both additional income to the bank and skips over the question of who owns the loan. When the insurance is reinstated or shown to have never lapsed in the the first place, it often names BOA thus lending support to the bank's position that it is the owner of the loan.
Looking at the title insurance, who is the loss payee? Besides the owner's policy there is a rider for the mortgagee named in the mortgage. Of course that party may not be a mortgagee when the mortgage is examined carefully. But changes in loss payees under title insurance usually requires notice and consent of the owner of the property.
Thus the question could be asked in Discovery about who was responsible for tracking title insurance, liability insurance and PMI, why does the policy name a loss payee other than the bank claiming ownership and what efforts were made by the bank to correct the identity of the creditor?
The same thing applies to PMI. If the payee is somebody different than the Forecloser you will notice that none of the banks allege that this is a breach of the mortgage contract. Why not? I think it is because the insurer would demand more proof than what is offered in court as to ownership and that the bank would not be able to satisfy the insurer that it had an insurable interest in the property.
Self-deception, rationalization and moral compass
Self-deception, rationalization and moral compass
by Neil Garfield
The
"parsha" this week from the Torah involves the story of the second
creation, when G-d wiped out all life on the earth except for Noah and
the inhabitants of his ark. The reason why this happened was thievery
amongst other reasons (beastiality included). But the part about
thievery was not just that people stole from one another, but because it
had become a way of life.
"Yiddish
humor defines "chutzpa" as the case of a child who murders his parents
and then asks for leniency from the court because he is an orphan!
"While
such exaggerated self-deception is hard to imagine in real life, the
capacity for human beings to lose touch with their actions can be truly
remarkable. A true story which illustrates this took place in a suburb
of Warsaw about 70 years ago:
"A
woman had come from out of town, bringing her family's meager savings
with her, searching for profitable business transactions. As it
happened, while she was staying at the local Jewish inn, thieves stole
her money. When the local rabbis saw how distraught the woman was, they
hit upon an unusual plan - to talk with the "leading" thieves in the
area, whom these rabbis knew, and see if the money could be retrieved.
"Surprised
at being summoned by the rabbis, the thieves agreed to a meeting. One
of the rabbis explained to them the difficult straits the victimized
woman was in, and, though he was not at all certain what their response
would be, suggested that the thieves keep 30 percent of the loot and
give the rest back to the poor woman. Upon hearing this, one thief fell
into a rage, shouting, "We worked hard for the money! It belongs to us!
We're not going to keep less than 60 percent!" (Quotes from http://www.aish.com).
The
problem here was the thinking process of the Rabbis, the thieves and
the victim. The victim did not ask for justice and return of her money.
The Rabbis failed to demand justice, making sure that the thieves did
not enjoy their loot and punishing them as an example to others, and the
thieves who had rationalized what they were doing as work and therefore
earning a place at the table of compensation. With everything so upside
down, and all humanity having entered into a dark period of self
deception, G-d makes the decision to flood the world and dispose of all
mankind and all other loving things, with a view toward restarting a
world that is not based in fiction and self delusion, rationalization
and acceptance of consistent immorality.
From
that era come reports that "often many thieves would descend on their
victim together, but each of them would take only a very small quantity
of goods to insure their individual exemption from prosecution. The
thieves would repeat this over and over again. The end result was that
though they had become enriched, the thieves could rationalize they
hadn't really done anything wrong, for, after all, no court was
demanding they stand trial."
"With
this understanding, the error of the flood generation was more than
simply a case of people constantly stealing. It was a situation in which
people had so lost their moral compass that they'd become embroiled in
self-deception and could no longer recognize that they'd done wrong. It
was because their self-deception had become so extreme that they were
beyond repair and the Almighty had no choice but to start His creation
all over again."
I
don't have the pay grade of someone who can say whether our current
situation is of biblical significance, but from my personal vantage
point it certainly appears that we have reached the point of total loss
of moral compass and the acceptance of thievery on a world-wide basis
with both the thieves and the victims rationalizing the system and the
government both allowing promoting violation of any moral standards and
the government's own laws. I speak of bankers and brokers, merchants and
politicians.
Before
we expect another flood it should be pointed out that the courts and
government are in conflict on this very point. In the mortgage mess the
decisions range from appropriate moral outrage at bank behavior to
intentionally turning a blind eye toward the bankers' behavior and
actually enforcing the deceptions and rewarding the bankers with
approval. The victims have largely accepted their fate in part because
of acceptance of an era of injustice. And even the lawyers who are there
to intervene on behalf of those who cannot fight for justice themselves
are in a state of denial and self deception. It is nearly universally
accepted that foreclosure is just and proper and that borrowers should
pay their debts.
I
accept the notion that borrowers should pay their debts and I even
accept the extreme remedy of throwing a family out on the street if they
agreed to use their home as collateral for a loan. But I ask the
question: if in 1996 it was announced that over the next 6 months tens
of millions of families were going to be enticed into taking loans based
upon false promises of property values, false promises that because of
unique innovations on Wall Street they would be able meet the payments
and even make money, and false representations that their lender was at
risk and could therefore would obviously not put itself in the position
of going out of business because these loans could not work, what would
you say to that?
If
borrowers should pay their debts, then are we not saying that they
should pay for the risk they knew they were taking? Would we not say
that the bankers themselves assumed the rest of the risk caused by
inflated appraisals, false underwriting, and false representations about
the sharing of risk? And what would we say to the investors who, like
the borrowers, assumed that the risk on the loans they were funding was
no greater than the risk on mortgage loans before this plan was put into
place? Wouldn't we say the investors should be paid 100% for the
principal they advanced the interest income they need to pay their
pensioners?
If
it was known in 1996 that more than $17 trillion would be taken from
investors under false pretenses and that the bankers would create a
"shadow banking system" tens times the size of the world's money supply,
the answer would have been "no, you can't do that." But because it
happened over 15 years instead of 6 months and happened one "loan" at a
time, it gradually eroded our outrage and acceptance of corrupt behavior
became the norm. If you look at the results, you can easily see that
the bankers retained all of their ill-gotten gains and were rewarded
with more!
If
it was known that 10,000,000 families would be displaced by the conduct
of bankers who were playing with other people's money and who moved
money under false pretenses claiming part of the movement were
conventional real estate mortgage loans, we would have said that would
have a devastating impact on our country driving it into a depression
worse than the 1930's. So we would have said no, you can't do that.
And
if the bankers attempted to do it all anyway, we would have stopped
them, seizing the money they were taking in and returning it to
investors and correcting the false mortgage liens and loans so that the
borrower was paying for the risk they agreed to assume not the risk
imposed on them by the corrupt bankers in a surprise "gotcha" that
clearly violated federal state deceptive lending laws. So at least
25,000,000 people get thrown out of their homes based on 2.5 persons per
household.
And
millions of people who think they can live off their pensions are going
to be learning that their vested pensions are now underfunded and that
they will be paid less because of losses from mortgage bonds that were
bogus from start to finish. And those victims mostly fail to express
outrage and claims for justice as the banks continue to make false
reports of proprietary transaction profits that are mere book entries
changing the apparent ownership of the money from investors to the
investment bankers.
Instead,
like the victim in the story above, most homeowners are accepting their
fate because they agree that borrowers should pay their debts. They
don't understand the concept of assumption of risk. Despite laws
requiring disclosure of the parties and terms of the loan our society
has adopted the view that the guiding principle should be borrowers
should pay the debts, as claimed by anyone who asserts the claim ---
even if they never loaned any money and have no money in the deal. The
laws and rules regarding disclosure were created to protect consumers
from banks who were clearly in a far superior position to understand the
transaction, the payment terms, the viability of the loan, the real
value of the collateral, and the likelihood that the transaction would
work. Today the Truth in lending Act, while still law, is ignored in
favor of expediting Foreclosures on loans that everyone agrees were
based upon false pretenses to both lender and borrower.
With
the victims out- gunned and lacking in the information that would
fully explain the way they got into this mess, the regulators, law
enforcement and lawmakers are supposed to do something for all these
people --- the borrowers and the investors. The government should have
made it known that this scheme involved taking people's pension money
and loaning their own money in a "loan" that was merely a transfer of
money from the persons pension account to the pockets of the investment
banker. The mortgage loan was merely window dressing and the bankers,
regulators and law enforcers and law makers are ignoring the reality,
self-deluding themselves and lazily helping the bankers. They propose
settlements like the Rabbis who offered a percentage to the thieves.
They bargain as though the thieves had legitimately earned some portion
of the theft from the poor women. They were accepting and ratifying
moral and legal corruption.
If
we start with the premise that borrowers should pay their debts, we are
already committing error. Long ago misbehavior of lenders caused both
common law and statutory rules and laws concerning the "just debt." If
the loan was usurious many states made it a crime, wiped out the
interest due and in some cases wiped out the principal as well to
dissuade others would might be tempted to prey upon people who don't
have advanced degrees in business and mathematics, people who don't have
years of experience squeezing transactions for profits not visible to
the laymen's eye.
Our
self delusion, rationalization and hypocrisy has reached epic
proportions. We apply moral and legal standards to borrowers, use that
to strip pension funds of any right to repayment and any protection of
collateral that was pledged to the bankers instead of the lenders. The
horrid hypocrisy of holding borrowers to a false moral and legal
standard while not starting, as the law as always done before, with the
premise that lenders should obey the law, disclose the true nature of
the transaction and behave in a moral and legal manner has supplanted
our system of justice that dates back to Judaic rules for reaching
justice as a result and not just finality.
Across
the country, using the false premise that the borrowers are responsible
for this mess, many courts, the media, government and law enforcement
are creating false settlements, admitting that the bankers have been and
still are misbehaving but allowing the bankers to retain their
ill-gotten gains. They have now assumed that despite the requirements of
due process and the rules of civil procedure that the borrowers should
be assumed wrong and the strangers bringing Foreclosures are right and
that any defense by the borrower should be dispatched as creating delay.
Expediency has now replaced justice. Expediency for the sake of bankers
and governments colluding with them.
If
Christianity stands for the proposition that people matter more than
business and money, if Judaism stands for the proposition that the Jews
are chosen to lead the way for a righteous life, if Muslims stand for
the proposition that followers of Islam are messengers of actual true
justice, then the state of the world, not just our own national economy,
is fast approaching the point where G-d hits the reset button again.
Thursday, September 12, 2013
Foreclosure Court: The Erosion of the Judiciary
Sadly we are seeing more of this. Inexperienced Judges, thrown into cases , that they know nothing about , because none of these cases are normal foreclosures and to treat them as they are , is blind justice and a failure to protect the innocent.
Written by a foreclosure attorney.
In recent months, though, the judiciary in many parts of Florida (not all, but many) has turned into something I don’t recognize. The change has been so sudden and so extreme that it’s altering the face of the judiciary and hindering that which I hold so dear – the right to fair hearings and due process. Yes, what I consider the “core” of a fully-functioning judicial system is eroding.
If you’re a Florida lawyer but you don’t handle foreclosure cases, you likely have no idea what I’m talking about. After all, outside of foreclosure-world, Florida’s courts are operating like normal, business as usual. Sure, the down economy has brought some minor changes, but all in all, our courts are functioning in a normal way.
Foreclosure cases, though, are a totally different animal.
I was chatting with a colleague the other day, an attorney who doesn’t handle foreclosure lawsuits, and he was shocked as I described the things I see in foreclosure court on a daily basis. This is a seasoned attorney who was SHOCKED at what I see every day. That made me realize … I’m not doing a good enough job of explaining the travesties I see every day in foreclosure-world.
It’s a tough line to toe, frankly. Bar rules prohibit me from disparaging any particular judge, so it’s sometimes difficult to explain what’s happening in foreclosure court without crossing that line. In this blog, though, I’m going to toe that line. Don’t misunderstand – I’m not criticizing anyone in particular. Rather, my critique – and that’s what I see this as, a constructive critique, coupled with a hope that everyone will realize just how flawed our system has become - is aimed at the entire institution. My concerns aren’t with any particular judge or any one ruling – they lie with the entire judicial system, the way the entire judiciary is operating right now, at least as it pertains to foreclosure cases.
I know what you’re thinking. I’m just a self-interested, foreclosure defense attorney who’s trying to delay foreclosures and let people live for free. I’m upset because the courts are making that more difficult. Right?
Before you blow off my concerns in that manner, you tell me. Are my concerns legitimate? Is this how a judicial system should operate? You tell me …
As a foreclosure defense lawyer, I’ve seen pro se homeowners attend hearings in their cases and not be allowed to speak. Not one word. It wasn’t that the judge didn’t hear the homeowner or didn’t realize he/she was present, either – the homeowner asked the judge to speak at a duly-noticed hearing and was not permitted to do so. Homeowner loses, yet couldn’t say one word. Isolated incident, you say? I’ve personally seen it more than once.
Not being permitted to speak has not been limited to pro se homeowners. I have personally been threatened with criminal contempt – criminal contempt – for moving to disqualify a judge after striking my defenses without letting me say one word about those defenses. Your defenses are stricken, you can’t talk, and if you complain about it, I’ll throw you in jail.
In many parts of Florida, attorneys are not permitted to attend foreclosure hearings by phone – regardless of how insignificant or short the hearing may be. Never mind that the Florida Supreme Court created a rule of judicial administration which requires phone appearances be permitted for hearings that are 15 minutes or less absent “good cause” – in many parts of Florida, attendance by phone is simply not permitted.
I’ve heard some justify this procedure by explaining how it’s difficult to deal with phone appearances in foreclosure cases. Really? How is it any more difficult than in other types of cases? Frankly, I can’t help but wonder if the prohibition on phone appearances is designed to make it harder for defense lawyers to appear in cases for homeowners, enabling the courts to push through those cases faster. (Prohibiting phone appearances obviously makes it harder and more expensive to attend hearings, often making the difference in a homeowner’s ability to afford counsel.)
That’s an absurd proposition, though, right? Why would our courts care how quickly foreclosure lawsuits are litigated? Judges are neutral arbiters – they don’t care how quickly the cases are adjudicated. Do they? COME TO VERMONT, MY JUDGE MAKES A POINT OF POINTING THIS OUT , ABOUT HOW LONG THIS CASE HAS GONE ON.
The answer to that question is at the heart of the problem. In recent months, the Florida legislature has been putting immense pressure on Florida judges to clear the backlog of foreclosure lawsuits. How much pressure? Well, the legislature controls the amount of funding that goes to our courts – funding that is needed to retain new judges, senior judges, court staff, and clerks (basically, the funding necessary to keep all judges and JAs from being totally overwhelmed). Unfortunately, the legislature has been giving these judges an ultimatum, kind of like parents do to their children regarding allowance. Basically, it works like this … “if you don’t finish these foreclosure cases, we won’t give you more funding.” As such, the legislature holds the judiciary hostage … if the judiciary doesn’t clear cases, then the legislature doesn’t give the judiciary the funding necessary to manage the many thousands of foreclosure lawsuits pending before it.
Perhaps worse yet, and to my sheer disgust, I’m told the legislature recently cut the pay of Florida judges (for the first time in years), and the clear understanding was that it was done as a way to punish/blame the judges for not clearing up the backlog of foreclosure cases faster. “You won’t enter judgments fast enough for our liking … we’ll cut your pay.”
(The pay of Florida judges is public record, right? Why is nobody talking about this?)
The judicial system shouldn’t operate this way. We all learned it in elementary school, how the three branches of government exist as “separate but equal” branches of government, employing a system of “checks and balances” to ensure a fully-functioning government. But that’s not what’s happening right now, certainly not in foreclosure court. In foreclosure-world, the legislature is king. TRUTH NO LONGER MATTERS, I WAS SHOWN THIS AND PEOPLE WONDER WHY WE NOW DISTRUST THOSE WE DEPENDED ON TO PROTECT US.
You might think this is conjecture and speculation on my part. It’s not. I can’t go a week without hearing how the legislature is forcing judges to move cases. Judges discuss it openly in open court, and not just to me – to everyone. As a result of this dynamic – judges wanting to move cases - I see all sorts of crazy things I’d never see in any other area of law.
I’ve mentioned the homeowners who can’t speak, the threats of incarcertaion, and the prohibition on phone appearances, but let’s get to some more egregious concerns.
Judges sua sponte set trials in foreclosure cases (without a Notice of Trial having been filed, without a CMC or pretrial conference, and without discussing/clearing the date with an counsel). This is now routine, virtually everywhere in the state.
Judges sua sponte set trials in foreclosure cases where a motion to dismiss is outstanding and the defendant has not filed an answer.
Judges sua sponte set trials with less than 30 days’ notice (such that, as defense counsel, you randomly receive a trial Order in the mail, reflecting you have a trial in 2 weeks).
The sua sponte setting of trials dominates the landscape of foreclosure-world. Banks often don’t want trials in foreclosure cases, but the judges will set them anyway. Then, even when the plaintiffs are vocal about not wanting a trial in that particular case, judges often insist they go forward anyway. Even stipulated/agreed Orders to continue a trial or vacate a trial Order often go unsigned.
Sometimes, where trial has been set in violation of Rule 1.440, judges will recognize the error and fix it. (The judges in Pinellas and Hillsborough in particular are good about this, striving to follow the law.) In many others cases, though, judges will proceed with trial anyway. In foreclosure circles, one county has become known for using a stamp – DENIED – right on the motion to vacate trial Order, without a hearing. Case not at issue? Doesn’t matter. Less than 30 days’ notice? Doesn’t matter. Bank doesn’t want a trial? Doesn’t matter. We’re going to trial! GOT THIS THROWN AT ME IN VT IN JAN OF THIS YEAR. WE WENT IN BLIND WITH NEW OWNERS.
Often, judges won’t proceed with trial where the defendant hasn’t filed an Answer but will essentially force the Answer to be filed forthwith. How is this accomplished? Easily – either deny the motion to dismiss (often without a hearing), or sua sponte set a CMC to ensure the case gets at issue. Some courts use CMCs as a way to, in my view, browbeat parties into settling. One county, for example, has started setting three CMCs at once – one per week for three consecutive weeks, requiring in-person attendance, at mass-motion calendars that last an hour or more, with no input from counsel on when the CMCs are scheduled. You’re not available? Too bad. You don’t need a CMC three weeks in a row? Yes, you do. Your case will get at issue and it will be set for trial.
Oh, and if you want to set a hearing in this county, you have to mail in a form – MAIL IN A FORM – and wait for them to respond to you, by mail, with a form that gives you a set hearing date, without any input from you on when that hearing takes place.
What dominates the thinking from the judiciary – again, not my speculation, but something the judges openly discuss - is their desire to “close” cases.THIS IS TRUE ALSO HERE IN VT. That’s the monster that the legislature has created – evaluating the performance of judges not based on their work as judges but based on the results set forth in an Excel spreadsheet. How many foreclosure lawsuits were filed in that county? How many judgments have been entered? If the ratio of judgments entered to cases filed is high enough, then the judges in that county are doing a good job and deserve more funding from the legislature. If not, then those judges and JAs can all suffer through the many thousands of cases without more help.
The dynamic is so perverse that I’ve seen judges refuse to cancel foreclosure sales even when both sides ask them to.
Plaintiff’s lawyer: “We don’t want this foreclosure sale to go forward, judge.”
Defendant’s lawyer: “We are living in this house. We don’t want this foreclosure sale to go forward, judge.”
Judge: “Foreclosure sale will go forward as scheduled.”
Huh?
This dynamic is particularly difficult to take when the parties have reached a settlement. For example, loan modifications sometimes happen after a judgment but before a sale. That means, essentially, that both sides are willing to forego foreclosure with the homeowner resuming monthly mortgage payments. Incredibly, based partly on their desire to “close” a case, some judges will force a foreclosure sale to go forward even when both parties don’t want it to, having settled their dispute via a loan modification.
Plaintiff’s lawyer: “We have agreed to a loan modification. We want the foreclosure sale cancelled.”
Defendant’s lawyer: “We have agreed to a loan modification. We wan the foreclosure sale cancelled.”
Judge: “Foreclosure sale will go forward as scheduled.”
Huh?
Even when both sides are able to resolve disputes before trial, even then they sometimes can’t escape a dress-down from the judiciary. For instance, I’ve watched judges threaten Bar grievances against lawyers – yes, Bar grievances – where they settled the lawsuit by consenting to a foreclosure judgment with a deficiency waiver and extended sale date. Mind you, that’s a perfectly legitimate way to compromise and settle a foreclosure lawsuit – bank gets the house, homeowner avoids any further liability and gets to stay in the house longer so as to pack up and move - but the prospect of the sale date getting pushed out 4-5 months angers some judges. “No, you can’t settle that way. The sale has to happen sooner.” Yes, I’ve seen settlements like this rejected with the sale set sooner than the parties agreed.
Huh?
There’s absolutely no rule or law that requires a sale to happen sooner where the parties agree. Unfortunately, the judges are motivated by having that case “closed” so the numbers on the spreadsheet look better for the legislature.
My natural response is to lament the unfairness of it all. After all, that homeowner gave up the chances of winning at trial predicated on getting more time in the house. I find it terribly unfair that the homeowner gave up a right to trial in exchange for an extended sale date that the judge took away … right? Some judges would scoff at that notion. After all, I’ve heard several times, in open court, ”there is no defense to foreclosure,” or “I’ve never seen a valid defense to foreclosure,” or words of that ilk. Never mind that I’ve had many dozens of foreclosure cases dismissed throughout Florida, including several at trial (25 different judges have dismissed a lawsuit of mine on paragraph 22 noncompliance, for example) … there is no valid defense to foreclosure and, hence, no reason for an extended sale date.
Another county has become known for punishing any defendants who force a trial to proceed. I personally observed the judge begin every hearing by telling the homeowners and their counsel that they “better” accept a 120-day extended sale date, as if that “offer” was rejected then it would be “off the table” after the trial. The implication here was obvious to everyone in the room … You want to show up and force the bank to prove its case? You’ll lose, and I’ll punish you by ruling against you and forcing you to move out sooner.
Some would say that the way to deal with this madness is to appeal. Easier said than done. Homeowners facing foreclosure are often in no position to fund an appeal. I’ve taken some appeals for free, but there’s only so many I can handle that way. Oh, and even if you get beyond the issue of funding, go look for published decisions that are pro-homeowner in the First DCA, Third DCA, or Fifth DCA. Many thousands of foreclosure cases have been adjudicated in those areas in the past several years. How many favorable rulings do you think have come out of those jurisdictions during that time? I’ll give you a hint – not many. In many ways, appealing in those parts of the state is like standing at the bottom of Mount Everest and being told “climb.”
Dealing with this dynamic has been very difficult in recent months. It’s a hard pill to swallow. It’s difficult to watch the judicial system bend at the direction of the legislature. It’s tough to know the concept of “separation of powers” that we all learned in elementary school is being cast aside. It’s hard to feel like the most fundamental concepts of due process are being sacrificed to push lawsuits faster when even the plaintiffs in those lawsuits don’t so desire. It’s hard to feel like these procedures have made it impossible for me to help homeowners in certain parts of the state. It’s frustrating that many reading this will be upset at the entire judiciary, not realizing there are many circuit judges – particularly in Hillsborough, Pinellas, and other areas within the ambit of Florida’s Second District – who are striving to be fair and follow the law notwithstanding all of the pressure from the legislature.
Mostly, though, I’m disappointed. I’m disappointed that such perverse procedures are happening in our courts every day yet nobody is talking about it – and many don’t even realize it’s happening. I’m disappointed that the justice system I knew is eroding. I’m not going to find a dictionary definition, but that’s what erosion is - a slow process of deterioration such that, before too long, that thing which previously existed is no more.
I hope everyone shares this blog. I hope my friends, colleagues, attorneys and homeowners all understand what’s happening in our courts. I hope everyone stands up to the legislature and demands it stop this madness. Most of all, I hope the erosion of our judiciary stops … soon.
AND WE WONDER WHY AMERICA IS LOST
Written by a foreclosure attorney.
Foreclosure Court: The Erosion of the Judiciary
I’m a big believer in the justice system. In fact, that’s part of why I became a lawyer. I believe in every litigant’s right to obtain a fair hearing and trial before a neutral judge and/or impartial jury. It sounds cliché, but that’s what I do – help people navigate the judicial system in their time of need.In recent months, though, the judiciary in many parts of Florida (not all, but many) has turned into something I don’t recognize. The change has been so sudden and so extreme that it’s altering the face of the judiciary and hindering that which I hold so dear – the right to fair hearings and due process. Yes, what I consider the “core” of a fully-functioning judicial system is eroding.
If you’re a Florida lawyer but you don’t handle foreclosure cases, you likely have no idea what I’m talking about. After all, outside of foreclosure-world, Florida’s courts are operating like normal, business as usual. Sure, the down economy has brought some minor changes, but all in all, our courts are functioning in a normal way.
Foreclosure cases, though, are a totally different animal.
I was chatting with a colleague the other day, an attorney who doesn’t handle foreclosure lawsuits, and he was shocked as I described the things I see in foreclosure court on a daily basis. This is a seasoned attorney who was SHOCKED at what I see every day. That made me realize … I’m not doing a good enough job of explaining the travesties I see every day in foreclosure-world.
It’s a tough line to toe, frankly. Bar rules prohibit me from disparaging any particular judge, so it’s sometimes difficult to explain what’s happening in foreclosure court without crossing that line. In this blog, though, I’m going to toe that line. Don’t misunderstand – I’m not criticizing anyone in particular. Rather, my critique – and that’s what I see this as, a constructive critique, coupled with a hope that everyone will realize just how flawed our system has become - is aimed at the entire institution. My concerns aren’t with any particular judge or any one ruling – they lie with the entire judicial system, the way the entire judiciary is operating right now, at least as it pertains to foreclosure cases.
I know what you’re thinking. I’m just a self-interested, foreclosure defense attorney who’s trying to delay foreclosures and let people live for free. I’m upset because the courts are making that more difficult. Right?
Before you blow off my concerns in that manner, you tell me. Are my concerns legitimate? Is this how a judicial system should operate? You tell me …
As a foreclosure defense lawyer, I’ve seen pro se homeowners attend hearings in their cases and not be allowed to speak. Not one word. It wasn’t that the judge didn’t hear the homeowner or didn’t realize he/she was present, either – the homeowner asked the judge to speak at a duly-noticed hearing and was not permitted to do so. Homeowner loses, yet couldn’t say one word. Isolated incident, you say? I’ve personally seen it more than once.
Not being permitted to speak has not been limited to pro se homeowners. I have personally been threatened with criminal contempt – criminal contempt – for moving to disqualify a judge after striking my defenses without letting me say one word about those defenses. Your defenses are stricken, you can’t talk, and if you complain about it, I’ll throw you in jail.
In many parts of Florida, attorneys are not permitted to attend foreclosure hearings by phone – regardless of how insignificant or short the hearing may be. Never mind that the Florida Supreme Court created a rule of judicial administration which requires phone appearances be permitted for hearings that are 15 minutes or less absent “good cause” – in many parts of Florida, attendance by phone is simply not permitted.
I’ve heard some justify this procedure by explaining how it’s difficult to deal with phone appearances in foreclosure cases. Really? How is it any more difficult than in other types of cases? Frankly, I can’t help but wonder if the prohibition on phone appearances is designed to make it harder for defense lawyers to appear in cases for homeowners, enabling the courts to push through those cases faster. (Prohibiting phone appearances obviously makes it harder and more expensive to attend hearings, often making the difference in a homeowner’s ability to afford counsel.)
That’s an absurd proposition, though, right? Why would our courts care how quickly foreclosure lawsuits are litigated? Judges are neutral arbiters – they don’t care how quickly the cases are adjudicated. Do they? COME TO VERMONT, MY JUDGE MAKES A POINT OF POINTING THIS OUT , ABOUT HOW LONG THIS CASE HAS GONE ON.
The answer to that question is at the heart of the problem. In recent months, the Florida legislature has been putting immense pressure on Florida judges to clear the backlog of foreclosure lawsuits. How much pressure? Well, the legislature controls the amount of funding that goes to our courts – funding that is needed to retain new judges, senior judges, court staff, and clerks (basically, the funding necessary to keep all judges and JAs from being totally overwhelmed). Unfortunately, the legislature has been giving these judges an ultimatum, kind of like parents do to their children regarding allowance. Basically, it works like this … “if you don’t finish these foreclosure cases, we won’t give you more funding.” As such, the legislature holds the judiciary hostage … if the judiciary doesn’t clear cases, then the legislature doesn’t give the judiciary the funding necessary to manage the many thousands of foreclosure lawsuits pending before it.
Perhaps worse yet, and to my sheer disgust, I’m told the legislature recently cut the pay of Florida judges (for the first time in years), and the clear understanding was that it was done as a way to punish/blame the judges for not clearing up the backlog of foreclosure cases faster. “You won’t enter judgments fast enough for our liking … we’ll cut your pay.”
(The pay of Florida judges is public record, right? Why is nobody talking about this?)
The judicial system shouldn’t operate this way. We all learned it in elementary school, how the three branches of government exist as “separate but equal” branches of government, employing a system of “checks and balances” to ensure a fully-functioning government. But that’s not what’s happening right now, certainly not in foreclosure court. In foreclosure-world, the legislature is king. TRUTH NO LONGER MATTERS, I WAS SHOWN THIS AND PEOPLE WONDER WHY WE NOW DISTRUST THOSE WE DEPENDED ON TO PROTECT US.
You might think this is conjecture and speculation on my part. It’s not. I can’t go a week without hearing how the legislature is forcing judges to move cases. Judges discuss it openly in open court, and not just to me – to everyone. As a result of this dynamic – judges wanting to move cases - I see all sorts of crazy things I’d never see in any other area of law.
I’ve mentioned the homeowners who can’t speak, the threats of incarcertaion, and the prohibition on phone appearances, but let’s get to some more egregious concerns.
Judges sua sponte set trials in foreclosure cases (without a Notice of Trial having been filed, without a CMC or pretrial conference, and without discussing/clearing the date with an counsel). This is now routine, virtually everywhere in the state.
Judges sua sponte set trials in foreclosure cases where a motion to dismiss is outstanding and the defendant has not filed an answer.
Judges sua sponte set trials with less than 30 days’ notice (such that, as defense counsel, you randomly receive a trial Order in the mail, reflecting you have a trial in 2 weeks).
The sua sponte setting of trials dominates the landscape of foreclosure-world. Banks often don’t want trials in foreclosure cases, but the judges will set them anyway. Then, even when the plaintiffs are vocal about not wanting a trial in that particular case, judges often insist they go forward anyway. Even stipulated/agreed Orders to continue a trial or vacate a trial Order often go unsigned.
Sometimes, where trial has been set in violation of Rule 1.440, judges will recognize the error and fix it. (The judges in Pinellas and Hillsborough in particular are good about this, striving to follow the law.) In many others cases, though, judges will proceed with trial anyway. In foreclosure circles, one county has become known for using a stamp – DENIED – right on the motion to vacate trial Order, without a hearing. Case not at issue? Doesn’t matter. Less than 30 days’ notice? Doesn’t matter. Bank doesn’t want a trial? Doesn’t matter. We’re going to trial! GOT THIS THROWN AT ME IN VT IN JAN OF THIS YEAR. WE WENT IN BLIND WITH NEW OWNERS.
Often, judges won’t proceed with trial where the defendant hasn’t filed an Answer but will essentially force the Answer to be filed forthwith. How is this accomplished? Easily – either deny the motion to dismiss (often without a hearing), or sua sponte set a CMC to ensure the case gets at issue. Some courts use CMCs as a way to, in my view, browbeat parties into settling. One county, for example, has started setting three CMCs at once – one per week for three consecutive weeks, requiring in-person attendance, at mass-motion calendars that last an hour or more, with no input from counsel on when the CMCs are scheduled. You’re not available? Too bad. You don’t need a CMC three weeks in a row? Yes, you do. Your case will get at issue and it will be set for trial.
Oh, and if you want to set a hearing in this county, you have to mail in a form – MAIL IN A FORM – and wait for them to respond to you, by mail, with a form that gives you a set hearing date, without any input from you on when that hearing takes place.
What dominates the thinking from the judiciary – again, not my speculation, but something the judges openly discuss - is their desire to “close” cases.THIS IS TRUE ALSO HERE IN VT. That’s the monster that the legislature has created – evaluating the performance of judges not based on their work as judges but based on the results set forth in an Excel spreadsheet. How many foreclosure lawsuits were filed in that county? How many judgments have been entered? If the ratio of judgments entered to cases filed is high enough, then the judges in that county are doing a good job and deserve more funding from the legislature. If not, then those judges and JAs can all suffer through the many thousands of cases without more help.
The dynamic is so perverse that I’ve seen judges refuse to cancel foreclosure sales even when both sides ask them to.
Plaintiff’s lawyer: “We don’t want this foreclosure sale to go forward, judge.”
Defendant’s lawyer: “We are living in this house. We don’t want this foreclosure sale to go forward, judge.”
Judge: “Foreclosure sale will go forward as scheduled.”
Huh?
This dynamic is particularly difficult to take when the parties have reached a settlement. For example, loan modifications sometimes happen after a judgment but before a sale. That means, essentially, that both sides are willing to forego foreclosure with the homeowner resuming monthly mortgage payments. Incredibly, based partly on their desire to “close” a case, some judges will force a foreclosure sale to go forward even when both parties don’t want it to, having settled their dispute via a loan modification.
Plaintiff’s lawyer: “We have agreed to a loan modification. We want the foreclosure sale cancelled.”
Defendant’s lawyer: “We have agreed to a loan modification. We wan the foreclosure sale cancelled.”
Judge: “Foreclosure sale will go forward as scheduled.”
Huh?
Even when both sides are able to resolve disputes before trial, even then they sometimes can’t escape a dress-down from the judiciary. For instance, I’ve watched judges threaten Bar grievances against lawyers – yes, Bar grievances – where they settled the lawsuit by consenting to a foreclosure judgment with a deficiency waiver and extended sale date. Mind you, that’s a perfectly legitimate way to compromise and settle a foreclosure lawsuit – bank gets the house, homeowner avoids any further liability and gets to stay in the house longer so as to pack up and move - but the prospect of the sale date getting pushed out 4-5 months angers some judges. “No, you can’t settle that way. The sale has to happen sooner.” Yes, I’ve seen settlements like this rejected with the sale set sooner than the parties agreed.
Huh?
There’s absolutely no rule or law that requires a sale to happen sooner where the parties agree. Unfortunately, the judges are motivated by having that case “closed” so the numbers on the spreadsheet look better for the legislature.
My natural response is to lament the unfairness of it all. After all, that homeowner gave up the chances of winning at trial predicated on getting more time in the house. I find it terribly unfair that the homeowner gave up a right to trial in exchange for an extended sale date that the judge took away … right? Some judges would scoff at that notion. After all, I’ve heard several times, in open court, ”there is no defense to foreclosure,” or “I’ve never seen a valid defense to foreclosure,” or words of that ilk. Never mind that I’ve had many dozens of foreclosure cases dismissed throughout Florida, including several at trial (25 different judges have dismissed a lawsuit of mine on paragraph 22 noncompliance, for example) … there is no valid defense to foreclosure and, hence, no reason for an extended sale date.
Another county has become known for punishing any defendants who force a trial to proceed. I personally observed the judge begin every hearing by telling the homeowners and their counsel that they “better” accept a 120-day extended sale date, as if that “offer” was rejected then it would be “off the table” after the trial. The implication here was obvious to everyone in the room … You want to show up and force the bank to prove its case? You’ll lose, and I’ll punish you by ruling against you and forcing you to move out sooner.
Some would say that the way to deal with this madness is to appeal. Easier said than done. Homeowners facing foreclosure are often in no position to fund an appeal. I’ve taken some appeals for free, but there’s only so many I can handle that way. Oh, and even if you get beyond the issue of funding, go look for published decisions that are pro-homeowner in the First DCA, Third DCA, or Fifth DCA. Many thousands of foreclosure cases have been adjudicated in those areas in the past several years. How many favorable rulings do you think have come out of those jurisdictions during that time? I’ll give you a hint – not many. In many ways, appealing in those parts of the state is like standing at the bottom of Mount Everest and being told “climb.”
Dealing with this dynamic has been very difficult in recent months. It’s a hard pill to swallow. It’s difficult to watch the judicial system bend at the direction of the legislature. It’s tough to know the concept of “separation of powers” that we all learned in elementary school is being cast aside. It’s hard to feel like the most fundamental concepts of due process are being sacrificed to push lawsuits faster when even the plaintiffs in those lawsuits don’t so desire. It’s hard to feel like these procedures have made it impossible for me to help homeowners in certain parts of the state. It’s frustrating that many reading this will be upset at the entire judiciary, not realizing there are many circuit judges – particularly in Hillsborough, Pinellas, and other areas within the ambit of Florida’s Second District – who are striving to be fair and follow the law notwithstanding all of the pressure from the legislature.
Mostly, though, I’m disappointed. I’m disappointed that such perverse procedures are happening in our courts every day yet nobody is talking about it – and many don’t even realize it’s happening. I’m disappointed that the justice system I knew is eroding. I’m not going to find a dictionary definition, but that’s what erosion is - a slow process of deterioration such that, before too long, that thing which previously existed is no more.
I hope everyone shares this blog. I hope my friends, colleagues, attorneys and homeowners all understand what’s happening in our courts. I hope everyone stands up to the legislature and demands it stop this madness. Most of all, I hope the erosion of our judiciary stops … soon.
AND WE WONDER WHY AMERICA IS LOST
OCC – Correcting Foreclosure Practices
Correcting Foreclosure Practices - Updated August 28, 2013
While cruising the Internet looking for the status of a particular bank, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) Independent Foreclosure Review website
jumped into view. The OCC website is worth an examination even though
the Submission Window is closed (way too early IMHO) as there are
numerous CONSENT ORDERS made available for viewing. Of course the accused financial and/or financial related companies never admit or deny the the “Findings” from the examination by the:
- (1) Comptroller of the Currency of the United States of America, through his national bank examiners and other staff of (2) the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”);
- (3) the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, D.C.,
- (4) the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”);
- (5) the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”); and
- (6) the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) …
1-6 above (Collectively the “Agencies”) …even though this was part of an interagency horizontal review (who apparently all 6 sections agreed to the results of the examination) of the major residential mortgage servicers and mortgage service providers.
??????
??????
Six (6)
frickin’ sectors of the Federal Government find that these companies to
be in violation of several consumer protection related statutes,
deceptive practices and pretty much scumbags and no one forces them to
admit to their wrongdoings!
The CONSENT ORDER
“Findings” are still worth reading and we don’t see why the same
“Findings” can’t find their way onto complaints and oppositions. Maybe
you’ll find a decent, reputable judge, like Judge Rakoff,
who will demand an admission along with a settlement. BTW - The
Independent Foreclosure Review Process continues for the following
servicers at this time: Everbank and OneWest (IndyMac). That means the claims have not been processed yet. To review the OCC website Click HERE.
Did you wonder why MERS was no longer foreclosing?
A particularly interesting “Consent Order” belonged to Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and MERSCORP, Inc. Click HERE for the MERS and MERSCORP, Inc. Consent Order.
What happened to the other 40 million? DON'T I WISH THAT WAS TRUE. :(“… as part of an interagency horizontal review of major residential mortgage servicers and mortgage service providers, have conducted an examination of MERSCORP, Inc. (“MERSCORP”), and of its wholly-owned subsidiary corporation, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., (“MERS”), both of which provide various services to financial institutions related to tracking and registering residential mortgage ownership and servicing, acting as mortgagee of record in the capacity of nominee for lenders, and initiating foreclosure actions.
The Agencies have identified certain deficiencies and unsafe or unsound practices by MERS and MERSCORP that present financial, operational, compliance, legal and reputational risks to MERSCORP and MERS, and to the participating Members. …
…By this Stipulation and Consent, which is incorporated by reference, MERS and MERSCORP have consented to the issuance of this Consent Cease and Desist Order (“Order”), pursuant to 12 U.S.C. §§ 1818(b), 1867(c)-(d), and 4631, by the Agencies, consistent with the Stipulation and Consent. …
There are currently approximately 31 million active residential mortgage loans registered on the MERS System.” [Read more]
The
verbiage in the Consent Order verifies DeadlyClear’s posts indicating
separate and distinct “MERS” corporations substantiating that Mortgage
Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and MERSCORP, Inc. are NOT the same company!
Related MERS posts:
" the double-cross.”
OneWest Bank pays 7 figures in mortgage fraud case
September 11, 2013
Steve Mnuchin
A San Luis Obispo County couple has received a million-dollar-plus settlement and title to two houses in a case that is likely to result in more lawsuits by people who lost property to mortgage lenders after the bursting of the housing bubble.
Greg and Irene Rigali of Shell Beach sued OneWest Bank, IndyMac Mortgage Services, U.S. Bank and GSR Loan Mortgage Trust after their home and a rental property in Grover Beach were foreclosed. At the time, the Rigalis were negotiating with OneWest Bank to modify their mortgages, sources familiar with the case said.
The case turned on a mortgage practice known as “dual tracking.” Under the practice, lenders work with borrowers who are in default but, at the same time, pursue foreclosure.
At the short end of the seven-figure settlement agreement were two nationally known individuals, billionaire Steve Mnuchin, principal owner of OneWest Bank; and Rik Tozzi, a prominent Alabama attorney specializing in banking litigation and “complex cases in difficult or dangerous jurisdictions,” according to his website.
Rik Tozzi
After Judge Crandall ruled for the Rigalis and before the next formal court proceedings, OneWest settled. The terms of the settlement are confidential and neither the Rigalis nor their attorneys would comment for this article.
The Rigali’s case had its beginnings about five years ago. Greg Rigali, a former L.A. County sheriff’s deputy, and his wife retired to a small but comfortable and beautifully situated residence in Shell Beach after their adult children left home. A while after that, the Rigalis acquired a rental property in Grover Beach.
It was about that time, while the Rigalis began making college plans for their adopted daughter, that they got solicitations from the holder of their Shell Beach mortgage, IndyMac Federal Bank, inviting them to modify the mortgages on both the home and the rental residence.
That invitation included allowing the Rigalis to suspend or reduce payments on their properties during the run-up to the loan modification.
While the Rigalis were negotiating on the mortgage modifications, IndyMac Federal Bank failed in what would be the fourth-largest bank failure in U.S. history. What was left of IndyMac was acquired in March 2009 by a Mnuchin-led group of private investors for $1.55 billion.
The newly christened OneWest Bank picked up with the Rigalis where IndyMac Federal Bank had left off and negotiations on the modification proceeded.
“Because you are a valued customer, we want to help you stay in your home. Reduce your monthly payment of principal and interest and bring your loan current,” read the new solicitation from OneWest Bank. “We propose to permanently modify your mortgage, bring past-due payments current, and provide you with an affordable monthly payment.”
The Rigalis’ court filings “alleged they were led to believe, by representatives of several banks over a period of years, that their $560,000 loan would be modified. They believed they had entered into several forbearance agreements with several but related banks.”
And so, the Rigalis worked with bank officials for the modification, following every requirement called for by OneWest loan officers, their court filings said. But as that took place, other OneWest officials were moving toward a quiet foreclosure of the valuable beach properties.
The Rigalis were making payments in accordance with a June 2009 agreement with the bank. That included a one-time payment of $3,444.06. OneWest Bank cashed the check even as it pursued foreclosure.
A month later OneWest Bank assigned the Rigali’s trust deed to U.S. Bank.
In September 2009, to the Rigali’s complete surprise, a trustee’s sale of their beach house was conducted, with U.S. Bank the only bidder.
A notice of foreclosure was posted on the couple’s home’s door while Irene Rigali was en route home from what she thought had been a successful meeting with bank officials.
Shortly thereafter OneWest Bank refunded the Rigali’s $3,444.06 check, and the Rigalis filed their lawsuit.
The Rigalis were represented by two local attorneys, Maria L. Hutkin and Jude J. Basile. Jane Heath of San Luis Obispo teamed with Southern California lawyers Marissa Prayongratana and Thomas Agawa to present OneWest’s case.
OneWest filed a motion for summary judgment, a legal maneuver in which a judge can end a case by ruling that there are no real contested issues in the lawsuit.
Mnuchin and Tozzi then attended the May hearing to learn firsthand Crandall’s decision. Crandall, however, denied their motions, setting the stage for trial.
Crandall wrote in his denial of the motion that “the facts before the court are sufficient to defeat summary judgment” of most of OneWest Bank’s assertions, and he concluded that the Rigalis produced enough proven evidence to show that they could prevail in a jury trial.
OneWest quickly offered a settlement, sources said.
But the Rigalis did not want to settle. They wanted to take their case to trial; they wanted a public airing of their complaints, and their attorneys so informed the court.
The Rigalis felt assured the facts of their case would prevail, sources familiar with the suit said.
Recent legislative measures “provide an important lens” for the court to look through, wrote Crandall in denying OneWest’s motion.
The judge was referring to the banking practice of dual tracking, in which a borrower in default seeks a modification while the institution continues at the same time to pursue foreclosure. By the time the borrower learns what is happening, it is usually too late to prevent the foreclosure.
As a California appellate court decision several years ago noted, “For homeowners struggling to avoid foreclosure, this dual tracking might go by another name: the double-cross.”
Monday, September 9, 2013
Zombie Propertie
Zombie Properties: Banks Don’t Want the Money, Don’t Want the Property: They Just Want Foreclosure Sale and Deed
The borrowers are for the most part willing to straighten this mess out if approached with fair terms that reinstate their credit and reinstate or create loans that are free from the myriad of defects in the falsely claimed securitization chains. The intermediate banks don't want that because they would be facing liability for trillions of dollars they collected through fraud, deceit and identity theft. So if things keep going the way they are going, the ultimate effect is indeed going to be that the "free house" is going to switch from the intermediate banks who have no just or legal claim to the property to the homeowner whose signature was used in ways he never agreed and would never have agreed.
With
6.6 foreclosures and an equal amount to come, given 2.5 residents per
household, more than 33 million people will be displaced--- paying the
price for the misbehavior of the bank and having been used as innocent,
ignorant pawns in a PONZI scheme that has nearly perfected the technique
of PONZI schemes. ---
Internet Store Notice: As requested by customer service, this is to explain the use of the COMBO, Consultation and Expert Declaration. The only reason they are separate is that too many people only wanted or could only afford one or the other — all three should be purchased. The Combo is a road map for the attorney to set up his file and start drafting the appropriate pleadings. It reveals defects in the title chain and inferentially in the money chain and provides the facts relative to making specific allegations concerning securitization issues. The consultation looks at your specific case and gives the benefit of litigation support consultation and advice that I can give to lawyers but I cannot give to pro se litigants. The expert declaration is my explanation to the Court of the findings of the forensic analysis. It is rare that I am actually called as a witness apparently because the cases are settled before a hearing at which evidence is taken.
Zombie
Properties got their name from being in a state of limbo. Broadly
characterized, they include first homes abandoned my misinformed
homeowners who believed their home was subject to a legitimate
foreclosure. Second they include properties subject to foreclosures but
where the bank has put off getting the final judgment or put off the
sale. And third they include properties in which the foreclosure sale
has occurred but the property was abandoned by the Banks.
Not
surprisingly many schemes have evolved in which the renting of these
properties has been accomplished by strangers to the transaction.
Knowing that the property is temporarily or permanently abandoned,
people are offering "deals" to renters, collecting rents on property
they don't own. In other cases the neighborhoods have become so blighted
that nobody would move in there if you gave the house to them. So
Detroit, Cleveland and other cities are bull dozing tens of thousands
of homes creating farm land and park land where businesses and
residential housing had been.
It
seems obvious now that the Banks want that foreclosure sale and that is
the end of the story. They don't want the money (we are trying to give
them the money in several cases (1000 cents on the dollar) and they are
resisting, they don't want the house (we are actually deeding the house
to them without prejudice and without an agreement to avoid a deficiency
judgment), They don't want reinstatement, they don't want redemption,
and they don't want any modification or mediation except just enough to
give the public relations impression that they are trying to work things
out. In most modifications, even where the modification is approved and
the homeowner complied with all terms including the payments, the Bank
goes ahead and forecloses anyway.
In
a real mortgage situation, Banks will do almost anything to avoid
foreclosure. If you review the literature on foreclosures prior to 2007
it is all based upon workouts in commercial and residential real estate.
In fact "workouts" are an area of concentration for most law firms that
engage in mortgage litigation whether they are on the lender side or
the borrower's side. Now now. The Bank wants the foreclosure sale and
the borrower, investor who put up the funds and insurers who "covered" a
"loss" and the counterparts who were covering announced losses, let
them be damned.
Why
do we have a pandemic of zombies and foreclosures when so many
homeowners are actually eager to sign new document that would clear up
the title problems caused by MERS, improper disclosure at closing as to
who the lender was, claims of fraud, predatory lending deceptive lending
etc.?
In
the law we say look to the result to determine the intention. There is
no doubt that the policies and procedures pursued by the banks, on loans
they never owned based upon mortgage bonds that were issued by unfunded
trusts, MINIMIZES the eventual monetary recovery and justifies the
payment of insurance, payment of hedge contracts (CDS), and the reports
to investors that there investment was lost because of foreclosures and
expenses of foreclosure, leaving the Banks with the money and frequently
the house too because they brought the foreclosure as a servicer
without stating they were acting for a principal that had advanced the
actual money for the loan.
Since
the Banks are evading payment in full, evading receipt of the deed to
the home, and evading workouts and modifications, the intent is clear no
matter how logical the other alternatives appear to the advantage of
all concerned. The intent is to get a foreclosure sale and deed on
foreclosure which in most states starts a short statute of limitations
ticking in which the deed on foreclosure cannot be challenged.
Of
course there are possible remedies involving fraud on the court or the
borrower that MIGHT change that but the foreclosure sale basically
closes the book on the matter. What does this do for the banks? It ends
the possibility of having to account for and pay back money received
from investors, insurers, CDS counterparties, guarantors (Fannie and
Freddie) and the Federal Reserve who has been buying the worthless
mortgage bonds (that supposedly represent a claim of ownership over the
loans) at the rate of $85 Billion per month apparently for years.
By
getting a deed from a foreclosure sale, they put another layer of
deniability between them, the Banks, and the parties from whom they took
money on the announced failure of the loans, the bonds or the asset
pools. The essential defect of the loans, that the payee and named
mortgagee never loaned a dime to the borrower (unknown to the borrower)
destroys the claim that the note and mortgage lien were ever perfected.
This defect results in a finding of no valid mortgage, nullification of
the instrument, and thus no security for the lending party --- something
that obviously smart Wall Street lawyers knew about but thought they
could finesse --- and they were right.
By
having the information at hand in a title and securitization analysis,
getting it explained in an Expert declaration from a credible source,
and consulting with those who actually understand what happened here,
the lawyer can feel confident that he is pleading and can prove that the
entire transaction was a sham. Ask any professor of law who knows
bills, notes, negotiable instruments, etc. If there was o underlying
transaction in which value was exchanged both ways, no enforceable
rights arise. There simply isn't a transaction at all, and all the
paperwork in the world isn't going to fix that without getting a
signature from the borrower --- which most borrowers are willing to do
if they get a fair modification based upon real values, instead of the
artificially inflated values that were used for the loans.
The
fact remains that virtually all loans were paid off in their entirety
whether they ever went into "default" (which could not exist because the
loan no longer existed), or whether they are performing loans in which
hapless homeowners are paying monthly payments to a bank who does not
own the loan, on a loan that either no longer exists or which has been
paid down by actual payment from parties who waived subrogation, waived
contribution and waived any right of action against the homeowner. If
the account receivable is paid off, the banks' claim for recovery one
more time (after being paid several times over 100 cents on the dollar)
in the form of a foreclosure is nothing more than looking for an
official governmental action that cuts off the players who advanced the
money on the same loan assets repeatedly.
Looking
again to the result to determine the intent, it cannot be argued that
the Banks pretended to issue mortgage bonds issued from a REMIC trust
that was never funded and then did whatever they wanted to do with the
trillions of dollars deposited with those investment bank for purchase
of the bonds. The investors weren't buying bonds. They were buying
problems. They were, contrary to agreement with the investment bank,
directly lending money to homeowners without a note or mortgage.
The
actual closing procedure was a sham. The closing agent applied the
money received from investors through one of the investment banks or an
affiliate of the investment bank as though it was a loan from the named
payee on the note and the named mortgagee on the mortgage or the named
beneficiary on the deed of trust.
Thus
the title, to which the investors were expecting and entitled was
diverted from the investors to puppet companies who were already under
contract to do what they were told --- as in the Assignment and
Assumption Agreement executed between the loan "originator" and the
"aggregator" neither of whom advanced a dime, nor did they need to do so
--- the money from the investors being at hand in a commingled account
at the investment bank who never followed through giving money or loans
to the Trustee of the New York "Trust" thus creating a legal entity that
had neither money nor assets.
The
illusion is ONLY completed with an apparently legal "foreclosure sale"
which creates a presumption of validity on the 6.6 million foreclosures
completed thus far, and the additional latest estimate of 7 million more
foreclosures). By fabricating foreclosure documents after the "trades"
had been completed (i.e., the banks had received payment for the bonds
and loans several times over that they never reported to the investors -
but which still must be accounted for as payment to the investor
because the investment banks were at all times acting as the agents of
the investors).
Confused?
Here is the easy way of looking at it. The Banks stole the identity of
the investors and the REMIC trust by issuing the bonds into street name"
but showing on end of month statements to the investors that they owned
the bonds and loans. After selling the loans several times or receiving
mitigating payments that were intended to reduce the loss, the loans
were worthless to the Banks and now represented a liability to give all
that money back because the underlying loans were fraudulent and
defective and the trading profits declared by the banks was really the
proceeds of theft. All the participants squeeze the last ounce of fees
and profit from this PONZI scheme which was completely reliant on the
continued purchase of the bogus mortgage bonds. When it was all over,
they pitched the loan over the fence and said the Trust owned it but
there had never been a transaction between the trust and anyone else in
which the trust paid for and was delivered the loan according to the
terms of the Prospectus and the Polling and Servicing Agreement.
Want
it shown differently? The Banks stole the identity of the borrowers and
traded on it knowing they would do anything possible to make the loan
go into default and thus collect, in addition to the original money
advanced by investors, insurance and other funds that paid off the loan
several times over. Some enterprising Class Action lawyer who really
knows what they are doing can lay claim to the vast pool of money that
emerged from this scheme with the real parties in interest -- the
investor lenders and the homeowner borrowers taking the loss. The
payment extinguishes the loan and the over payment collected by the
banks is due back to the homeowner unless the investors intervene and
assert claims to the pool of money that ultimately was held by firms
that were at best only intermediaries and at worst (and usually)
complete strangers tot he transactions with investors and complete
strangers to transactions with the borrowers.
The
borrowers are for the most part willing to straighten this mess out if
approached with fair terms that reinstate their credit and reinstate or
create loans that are free from the myriad of defects in the falsely
claimed securitization chains. The intermediate banks don't want that
because they would be facing liability for trillions of dollars they
collected through fraud, deceit and identity theft. So if things keep
going the way they are going, the ultimate effect is indeed going to be
that the "free house" is going to switch from the intermediate banks who
have no just or legal claim to the property to the homeowner whose
signature was used in ways he never agreed and would never have agreed.
Tuesday, August 20, 2013
JPMorgan hit by U.S. bribery probe
|
|
How
did the banks get away with it? Bribery takes many forms. It doesn't
need to be a direct payment, but merely something of value to the
regulator or law enforcement officer. In this case it is the hiring of
children of banking regulators in China. There is no reason why we
should think that couldn't happen here. It did. The revolving door of
regulators, law enforcement and the banks has long been known.
Even
if it isn't a bribe, the bank is hiring people and then designating
them for important positions in government regulation. Jamie Dimon sits
on the Board at the New York Federal Reserve. Being immersed in the bank
culture, the people involved come to believe the myths repeated every
day. It becomes part of their culture.
The
reason why the decisions on banking have been so chaotic is that there
is a direct conflict between the real world and the illusions created by
the banks. Put another way, the difference is between truth and
fiction.
The
fact remains that practically no mortgage can be satisfied or released
because the ownership is completely deranged. The correction can only
come from the courts when they realize and learn that the origination of
the loan was a sham transaction, not just a table funded loan, and that
the intent was fraud on the investors and homeowners (who were also
"investors"). The scheme unraveled precisely in concert with investors
ceasing to buy the "mortgage bonds" issued by entities in "street name."
That is the red flag that alerts authorities that the securitization
chain was in fact a fraudulent PONZI scheme. The issuers were designated
asset pools that had nothing in them, and in most cases were not
funded, directly or indirectly. So the mortgage bonds were worthless.
And
now that the facts are being slowly revealed, the depth of malfeasance
by the banks is being recognized for what it is --- but the government
is sticking with its policy of "no prosecution." Until the government
steps up to the mike and says outright that the scheme was a fraudulent
scheme in which the borrowers were used as pawn to steal money from
investors, most people are not going to believe it. Until respectable
economists and legal scholars step up and say that the loan transaction
described in the note never existed and was a strawman transaction that
should have been revealed to the borrower, this tragedy will stop.
Study
the Assignment and Assumption Agreements executed before the first loan
application was ever accepted for review. Track the money from
strangers showing up at closing as though it was the money of the
designated payee on the note and mortgage. The rest will be easy. But
until regulators see the public as their boss instead of the banks,
don't expect any help from outside the courtroom.
UNFORTUNATELY THE HELP FROM INSIDE THE COURTS ARE LIMITED AS WELL.
Monday, August 19, 2013
Will Justice ever come? Or is this our last chance?
"We
are still in the death grip of the banks as they attempt to portray
themselves as the bulwarks of society even as they continue to rob us of
homes, lives, jobs and vitally needed capital which is being channeled
into natural resources so that when we commence the gargantuan task of
repairing our infrastructure we can no longer afford it and must borrow
the money from the thieves who created the gaping hole in our economy
threatening the soul of our democracy." Neil Garfield, livinglies.me
We
all know that dozens of people rose to power in Europe and Asia in the
1930's and 1940's who turned the world on its head and were responsible
for the extermination of tens of millions of people. World War II still
haunts us as it projected us into an arms race in which we were the
first and only country to kill all the people who lived in two cities in
Japan. The losses on both sides of the war were horrendous.
Some of us remember the revelations in 1982 that the United States actively recruited unrepentant Nazi officers and scientists for intelligence and technological advantages in the coming showdown with what was known as the Soviet Union. Amongst the things done for the worst war criminals was safe passage (no prosecution for war crimes) and even new identities created by the United States Department of Justice. Policy was created that diverted richly deserved consequences into rich rewards for knowledge. With WWII in the rear view mirror policy-makers decided to look ahead and prepare for new challenges.
Some of us remember the revelations in 1982 that the United States actively recruited unrepentant Nazi officers and scientists for intelligence and technological advantages in the coming showdown with what was known as the Soviet Union. Amongst the things done for the worst war criminals was safe passage (no prosecution for war crimes) and even new identities created by the United States Department of Justice. Policy was created that diverted richly deserved consequences into rich rewards for knowledge. With WWII in the rear view mirror policy-makers decided to look ahead and prepare for new challenges.
Some
of us remember the savings and loans scandals where banks nearly
destroyed everything in the U.S. marketplace in the 1970's and 1980's.
Law enforcement went into high gear, investigated, and pieced together
the methods and complex transactions meant to hide the guilt of the main
perpetrators in and out of government and the business world. More than
800 people went to jail. Of course, none of the banks had achieved the
size that now exists in our financial marketplace.
Increasing
the mass of individual financial institutions produced a corresponding
capacity for destruction that eclipsed anything imagined by anyone
outside of Wall Street. The exponentially increasing threat was ignored
as the knowledge of Einstein’s famous equation faded into obscurity. The
possibilities for mass destruction of our societies was increasing
exponentially as the mass of giant financial service companies grew and
the accountability dropped off when they were allowed to incorporate and
even sell their shares publicly, replacing a system, hundreds of years
old in which partners were ultimately liable for losses they created.
The
next generation of world dominators would be able to bring the world to
its knees without firing a shot or gassing anyone. Institutions grew as
malignancies on steroids and created the illusion of contributing half
our gross domestic product while real work, real production and real
inventions were constrained to function in a marketplace that had been
reduced by 1/3 of its capacity --- leaving the banks in control of $7
trillion per year in what was counted as gross domestic product. Our
primary output by far was trading paper based upon dubious and
fictitious underlying transactions; if those transactions had existed,
the share of GDP attributed to financial services would have remained at
a constant 16%. Instead it grew to half of GDP. The "paradox" of
financial services becoming increasingly powerful and generating more
revenues than any other sector while the rest of the economy was
stagnating was noted by many, but nothing was done. The truth of this
"paradox" is that it was a lie --- a grand illusion created by the
greatest salesmen on Wall Street.
So
even minimum wage lost 1/3 of its value adjusted for inflation while
salaries, profits and bonuses were conferred upon people deemed as
financial geniuses as a natural consequence of believing the myths
promulgated by Wall Street with its control over all forms of
information, including information from the government.
But
calling out Wall Street would mean admitting that the United States had
made a wrong turn with horrendous results. No longer the supreme leader
in education, medical care, crime, safety, happiness and most of all
prospects for social and economic mobility, the United States had become
supreme only through its military strength and the appearance of
strength in the world of high finance, its currency being the world’s
reserve despite the reality of the ailing economy and widening
inequality of wealth and opportunity --- the attributes of a banana
republic.
All
of us remember the great crash of 2008-2009. It was as close as could
be imagined to a world wide nuclear attack, resulting in the apparent
collapse of economies, tens of millions of people being reduced to
poverty, tossed out of their homes, sleeping in cars, divorces, murder,
riots, suicide and the loss of millions of jobs on a rising scale (over
700,000 per month when Obama took office) that did not stop rising until
2010 and which has yet to be corrected to figures that economists say
would mean that our economy is functioning at proper levels. Month after
month more than 700,000 people lost their jobs instead of a net gain of
300,000 jobs. It was a reversal of 1 million jobs per month that could
clean out the country and every myth about us in less than a year.
The
cause lay with misbehavior of the banks --- again. This time the
destruction was so wide and so deep that all conditions necessary for
the collapse of our society and our government were present. Policy
makers, law enforcement and regulators decided that it was better to
maintain the illusion of business as usual in a last ditch effort to
maintain the fabric of our society even if it meant that guilty people
would go free and even be rewarded. It was a decision that was probably
correct at the time given the available information, but it was a policy
based upon an inaccurate description of the disaster written and
produced by the banks themselves. Once the true information was
discovered the government made another wrong turn --- staying the course
when the threat of collapse was over. In a sense it was worse than
giving Nazi war criminals asylum because at the time they were protected
by the Department of Justice their crimes were complete and there
existed little opportunity for them to repeat those crimes. It could be
fairly stated that they posed no existing threat to safety of the
country. Not so for the banks.
Now
as all the theft, deceit and arrogance are revealed, the original
premise of the DOJ in granting the immunity from prosecution was based
upon fraudulent information from the very people to whom they were
granting safe passage. We have lost 5 million homes in foreclosure from
their past crimes, but we remain in the midst of the commission of
crimes --- another 5 million illegal, wrongful foreclosures is
continuing to wind its way through the courts.
Not
one person has been prosecuted, not one statement has been made
acknowledging the crimes, the continuing deceit in sworn filings with
regulators, and the continuing drain on the economy and our ability to
finance and capitalize on innovation to replace the lost productivity in
real goods and services.
We
are still in the death grip of the banks as they attempt to portray
themselves as the bulwarks of society even as they continue to rob us of
homes, lives, jobs and vitally needed capital which is being channeled
into natural resources so that when we commence the gargantuan task of
repairing our infrastructure we can no longer afford it and must borrow
the money from the thieves who created the gaping hole in our economy
threatening the soul of our democracy. If the crimes were in
the rear view mirror one could argue that the policy makers could make
decisions to protect our future. But the crimes are not just in the rear
view mirror. More crimes lie ahead with the theft of an equal number of
millions of homes based on false and wrongful foreclosures deriving
their legitimacy from an illusion of debt --- an illusion so artfully
created that most people still believe the debts exist. Without a very
sophisticated knowledge of exotic finance it seems inconceivable that a
homeowner could receive the benefits of a loan and at the same time or
shortly thereafter have the debt extinguished by third parties who were
paid richly for doing so.
Job
creation would be unleashed if we had the courage to stop the
continuing fraud. It is time for the government to step forward and call
them out, stop the virtual genocide and let the chips fall where they
might when the paper giants collapse. It’s complicated, but that is your
job. Few people lack the understanding that the bankers behind this
mess belong in jail. This includes regulators, law enforcement and even
judges. but the "secret" tacit message is not to mess with the status
quo until we are sure it won't topple our whole society and economy.
The
time is now. If we leave the bankers alone they are highly likely to
cause another crash in both financial instruments and economically by
hoarding natural resources until the prices are intolerably high and we
all end up pleading for payment terms on basic raw materials for the
rebuilding of infrastructure. If we leave them alone another 20 million
people will be displaced as more than 5 million foreclosures get
processed in the next 3-4 years. If we leave them alone, we are allowing
a clear and present danger to the future of our society and the
prospects for safety and world peace. Don't blame Wall Street --- they
are just doing what they were sent to do --- make money. You don't hold
the soldier responsible for firing a bullet when he was ordered to do
so. But you do blame the policy makers that him or her there. And you
stop them when the policy is threatening another crash.
Stop
them now, jail the ones who can be prosecuted, and take apart the large
banks. IMF economists and central bankers around the world are looking
on in horror at the new order of things hoping that when the United
States has exhausted all other options, they will finally do the right
thing. (see Winston Churchill quote to that effect).
But
forget not that the ultimate power of government is in the hands of the
people at large and that the regulators and law enforcement and judges
are working for us, on our nickle. Action like Occupy Wall Street is
required and you can see the growing nature of that movement in a sweep
that is entirely missed by those who arrogantly pull the levers of power
now. OWS despite criticism is proving the point --- it isn't new
leaders that will get us out of this --- it is the withdrawal of consent
of the governed one by one without political affiliation or worshiping
sound sound biting, hate mongering politicians.
People
have asked me why I have not until now endorsed the OWS movement. The
reason was that I wanted to give them time to see if they could actually
accomplish the counter-intuitive result of exercising power without
direct involvement in a corrupt political process. They have proven the
point and they are likely to be a major force undermining the demagogues
and greedy bankers and businesses who care more about their bottom line
than their society that gives them the opportunity to earn that bottom
line.
New Fraud Evidence Shows Trillions Of Dollars In Mortgages Have No Owner
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/08/13/2460891/new-fraud-evidence-shows-trillions-of-dollars-in-mortgages-have-no-owner/
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/08/13/2460891/new-fraud-evidence-shows-trillions-of-dollars-in-mortgages-have-no-owner/
Saturday, August 3, 2013
HSBC - WOW!
| credit to Brian Kelley for an excellent find! |
Looky Looky what HSBC owns!!!
This lovely bit of information came to me by way of a little birdy flying on by. This is a list of some of the companies that HSBC owns- not all, because even more are hidden behind other ghost corporations and shells, and there are those companies that are owned by these companies listed below, and the joint ventures between these companies with other shell corporations..... I will say that I find it quite interesting that the USA list is divided into USA (Delaware) and USA (Not Delaware)..... don't you find that interesting?
But you know what's W A Y more interesting? If you scroll down to the very very bottom of the page, you'll see that the last "Subsidiary Name" is listed under Viet Nam, shows 100% "percentage held" by HSBC..... and it's S.W.I.F.T. Now.... anyone who knows banking, anyone who knows finance at all, knows S.W.I.F.T.
SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication)provides a network that enables financial institutions worldwide to send and receive information about financial transactions in a secure, standardized and reliable environment. Swift also sells software and services to financial institutions, much of it for use on the SWIFTNet Network, and ISO 9362. Business Identifier Codes (BICs) are popularly known as "SWIFT codes".
Basically- SWIFT codes move ALLLL the money allllll over the world.
...and HSBC owns it. Nifty eh?
If you want to have some fun, pick a couple of these purported "companies" and so do a little searching. I've only spent about 30 minutes and I've already spotted at least 5 different "shell" corporations. Have Fun!!! :>D
I had to adjust the cells of the spread sheet so that I could fit them all onto the page - sorry the info is a bit squished, LOL! (I've readjusted the table and sorted by percent held and jurisdiction. Note percent held indicates the amount of direct ownership of the subsidiary, secrecy score 0=transparent 100=opaque -AK)
| Subsidiary Name | Percent Held | Jurisdiction | Secrecy Score | |||||||||||||||||||
| HEXAGO INVERSIONES ARGENTINA S.A. | 100 | Argentina (AR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ARGENTINA HOLDINGS S.A. | 100 | Argentina (AR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK ARGENTINA S.A. | 100 | Argentina (AR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC LA BUENOS AIRES SEGUROS S.A. | 100 | Argentina (AR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MBI SA | 100 | Argentina (AR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MW GESTION SA | 100 | Argentina (AR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CHACABUCO INVERSIONES | 99 | Argentina (AR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SERVICIOS FINANCIEROS | 97 | Argentina (AR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| UNISERVICIOS S.A. | 97 | Argentina (AR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC NEW YORK LIFE SEGUROS DE RETIRO | 60 | Argentina (AR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC NEW YORK LIFE SEGUROS DE VIDA | 60 | Argentina (AR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MAXIMA S.A. AFJP | 60 | Argentina (AR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ADMINISTRADORA DE INVERSIONES S.A. | 56 | Argentina (AR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC VALORES S.A. SOCIEDAD DE BOLSA | 2 | Argentina (AR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PARTICIPACIONES | 1 | Argentina (AR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK ARMENIA CJSC | 68 | Armenia (AM) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ACRA CREDIT REPORTING CJSC | 3 | Armenia (AM) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ARMENIAN CARD CJSC | 1 | Armenia (AM) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ACN 087 652 113 PTY LIMITED | 100 | Australia (AU) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED | 100 | Australia (AU) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED | 100 | Australia (AU) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CUSTODY NOMINEES | 100 | Australia (AU) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FINANCE HOLDINGS | 100 | Australia (AU) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES | 100 | Australia (AU) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES INVESTMENTS | 100 | Australia (AU) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MIDLAND AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED | 100 | Australia (AU) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GLOBAL ASSET MANAGEMENT | 79 | Austria (AT) | 65.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BANCO DEL ISTMO | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CIC HOLDINGS LTD | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CRANLEIGH INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| EQUATOR LEASING SEVENTEEN LIMITED | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| EQUATOR LEASING TWELVE LIMITED | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| EVERLASTING INTERNATIONAL LIMITED | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG BANK | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG BANK TRUSTEE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG CREDIT | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG FINANCE | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG INSURANCE | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HIGHCLERE INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK BAHAMAS LIMITED | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GLOBAL ASSET MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INTERNATIONAL | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INTERNATIONAL TRUSTEE | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INVESTMENTS | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC MARKETS | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SERVICES JAPAN LIMITED | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| LLANDUDNO INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MICHIGAN INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PACIFICO CHILE LTD | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SILVER JUBILEE LIMITED | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SOLANDRA INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TAYSIDE HOLDINGS LIMITED | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| WAYHONG | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| WINNIPEG INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ARABIAN GULF INVESTMENTS OVERSEAS LIMITED | 26 | Bahamas, The (BS) | 82.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CARLISLE | 100 | Barbados (BB) | 78.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TRIDENT CAPITAL | 100 | Barbados (BB) | 78.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC LEASING | 100 | Belgium (BE) | 59.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BANCO NOMINEES LIMITED | 100 | Bermuda (BM) | 85.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BANK OF BERMUDA | 100 | Bermuda (BM) | 85.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BERMUDA INTERNATIONAL SECURITIES LIMITED | 100 | Bermuda (BM) | 85.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BERMUDA TRUST COMPANY LIMITED | 100 | Bermuda (BM) | 85.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| COMPASS NOMINEES LIMITED | 100 | Bermuda (BM) | 85.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| COMPASS SERVICES LIMITED | 100 | Bermuda (BM) | 85.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GENOPORT | 100 | Bermuda (BM) | 85.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GLOBAL ASSET MANAGEMENT | 100 | Bermuda (BM) | 85.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSTITUTIONAL TRUST SERVICES | 100 | Bermuda (BM) | 85.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSURANCE | 100 | Bermuda (BM) | 85.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSURANCE HOLDINGS | 100 | Bermuda (BM) | 85.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSURANCE MANAGEMENT | 100 | Bermuda (BM) | 85.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC LIFE | 100 | Bermuda (BM) | 85.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC NOMINEE SERVICES | 100 | Bermuda (BM) | 85.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE EQUITY MANAGEMENT | 100 | Bermuda (BM) | 85.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES SERVICES | 100 | Bermuda (BM) | 85.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ICOM LIMITED | 100 | Bermuda (BM) | 85.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| NAUTICAL NOMINEES LIMITED | 100 | Bermuda (BM) | 85.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SOMERS NOMINEES | 100 | Bermuda (BM) | 85.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| THE BANK OF BERMUDA LIMITED | 100 | Bermuda (BM) | 85.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| WOODEX LIMITED | 100 | Bermuda (BM) | 85.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| KIRK MANAGEMENT LTD. | 60 | Bermuda (BM) | 85.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PROSERVE BERMUDA LIMITED | 50 | Bermuda (BM) | 85.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BW GROUP LIMITED | 7 | Bermuda (BM) | 85.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| AMETISTA ADMINISTRACAO DE BENS LTDA | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BOAVENTURA ADMINISTRACAO DE BENS LTDA | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CREDIVAL PARTICIPACOES ADMINISTRACAO E ASSESSORIA LTDA | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ESTRELA GUIA ADMINISTRACAO DE BENS LTDA | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FRANCINVEST INVESTIMENTOS E PARTICIPACOES LTDA | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ADMINISTRACAO DE SERVICOS PARA FUNDOS DE PENSAO | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ASSISTENCIA PREVIDENCIARIA | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK BRASIL S.A. - BANCO MULTIPLO | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CAPITALIZACAO | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CORRETORA DE SEGUROS | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CORRETORA DE TITULOS E VALORES MOBILIARIOS S.A. | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC EMPRESA DE CAPITALIZACAO | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FINANCE | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GESTÃO DE RECURSOS LTDA. | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC LEASING ARRENDAMENTO MERCANTIL | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE EQUITY LATIN AMERICA | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SEGUROS | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SERVICOS E PARTICIPACOES LTDA | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC VIDA E PREVIDENCIA | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| JASMIM ADMINISTRACAO DE BENS LTDA | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| LIRIO ADMINISTRACAO DE BENS LTDA | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| LOSANGO PROMOCOES DE VENDAS LTDA. | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MONTE ALEGRE ADMINISTRACAO DE BENS LTDA | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SERRA AZUL ADMINISTRACAO DE BENS LTDA | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| VALEU COMPANHIA SECURITIZADORA DE CREDITOS FINANCEIROS | 100 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT | 86 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TECNOLOGIA BANCARIA S A | 10 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SERASA - SA | 7 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| INSTITUTO HSBC SOLIDARIEDADE | 1 | Brazil (BR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CARIBBEAN REINSURANCE | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CASNAM LIMITED | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CASTLEGUARD PROPERTIES INC | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CORHOLD LIMITED | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| EQUINOM SECURITIES INC. | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ETON MANAGEMENT LIMITED | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FIRST CORPORATE DIRECTOR INC. | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GZ CORPORATE SERVICES LTD | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GZ MANAGEMENT SERVICES LTD | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GZ TRUST CORPORATION | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FAMILY OFFICE SERVICES LIMITED | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FAMILY TAX STRATEGIES | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSTITUTIONAL TRUST SERVICES | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INTERNATIONAL TRUSTEE | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INTERNATIONAL TRUSTEE LIMITED | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE EQUITY MANAGEMENT | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE EQUITY MIDDLE EAST LIMITED | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE EQUITY MIDDLE EAST MANAGEMENT LIMITED | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES ASIA INTERNATIONAL NOMINEES LIMITED | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TRUST COMPANY | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC VENTURE INVESTMENT | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| LION INTERNATIONAL CORPORATE SERVICES LIMITED | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| LION INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MARVEL POINT INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| NOMIHOLD SECURITIES INC. | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PRIVATE EQUITY MANAGEMENT BVI 2 LIMITED | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PRIVATE EQUITY MANAGEMENT BVI LIMITED | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SECOND CORPORATE DIRECTOR INC. | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SICO LIMITED | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SPARX GLOBAL MARKETS LTD. | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TORCH INVESTMENT | 100 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MAGNIFICENT STALLION INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 33 | British Virgin Islands (VG) | 81.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FINANCE | 100 | Brunei Darussalam (BN) | 84.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES | 100 | Brunei Darussalam (BN) | 84.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD TRUST COMPANY | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK CANADA | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CAPITAL | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CAPITAL 2005 INC. | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CAPITAL A.C.I. GP INC. | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CAPITAL ALLIED GP INC. | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CAPITAL BOS GP INC. | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CAPITAL CANADA FUND | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CAPITAL CANADA PEF 2005 | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CAPITAL JAG GP INC. | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CAPITAL NUHEAT GP INC. | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CAPITAL RAIL GP INC. | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CAPITAL SERVICES INC. | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FINANCE CORPORATION CANADA | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FINANCE MORTGAGES INC. | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FINANCIAL CORPORATION LIMITED | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GLOBAL ASSET MANAGEMENT | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSURANCE AGENCY | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INVESTMENT FUNDS | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC LOAN CORPORATION | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC MORTGAGE CORPORATION | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC RETAIL SERVICES LIMITED | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TRUST COMPANY | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| JAMES CAPEL CANADA HOLDINGS INC. | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PEF 2005 A.C.I. INVESTMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PEF 2005 ALLIED INVESTMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PEF 2005 NUHEAT INVESTMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PEF 2005 RAIL INVESTMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | 100 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TRINKAUS CANADA 1 GP LTD. | 79 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PEF 2005 JUMP INVESTMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | 74 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ENCORE COILS INC. | 70 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ENCORE METALS INC. | 70 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CAPITAL ALUMICOR GP INC. | 37 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CAPITAL JUMP GP INC. | 37 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PEF 2005 ALUMICOR INVESTMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | 37 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PEF 2005 JAG INVESTMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | 37 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PEF2005 BOS INVESTMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | 36 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| QZINA SPECIALTY FOODS NORTH AMERICA INC. | 36 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ALLIED GLOBAL HOLDINGS INC. | 33 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ENCORE COILS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | 25 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ENCORE METALS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | 25 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FLOCONTROL HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | 21 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| NORTHSTAR TRADE FINANCE INC. | 18 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ALUMICOR LIMITED | 17 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| JUMP.CA WIRELESS SUPPLY CORP. | 11 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| JAG FLOCOMPONENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | 10 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ASTLEY-GILBERT REPRODUCTIONS LIMITED | 9 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| A & B INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP LTD. | 7 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| A & B RAIL SERVICES LTD. | 7 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| WESTERN CANADA RAIL LTD. | 7 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| NUHEAT INDURSTRIES LIMITED | 6 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BOS SOLUTIONS LTD. | 5 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ACI BRANDS INC. | 2 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| STAR CASE CANADA INC. | 2 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| REDKNEE SOLUTIONS INC. | 1 | Canada (CA) | 56.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC LION FUNDING | 150 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BANK OF BERMUDA | 100 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BERMUDA INVESTORS LIMITED | 100 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BERMUDA TRUST | 100 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CAYMAN INTERNATIONAL FINANCE LIMITED | 100 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CAYMAN NOMINEES LIMITED | 100 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| COWSLIP FUNDING | 100 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| EASTBOURNE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED | 100 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ALPHA EXCHANGE | 100 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ALPHA FUNDING | 100 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ALPHA INVESTMENTS | 100 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ALPHA PLUS | 100 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK | 100 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GUYERZELLER TRUST COMPANY | 100 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSURANCE & TAKAFUL SPC LTD | 100 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSURANCE SPC LIMITED | 100 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC LIFE INSURANCE | 100 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC NOMINEES | 100 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TRUSTEE | 100 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MIL | 100 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TROPICAL NOMINEES LIMITED | 100 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| AEA INVESTORS | 99 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ROSE FUNDING | 80 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ROSE INVESTMENTS | 80 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC KINGDOM AFRICA INVESTMENTS | 50 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| THE HSBC TECHNOLOGY FUND LIMITED | 47 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| THE HSBC PRIVATE EQUITY FUND 3 LIMITED | 40 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| THE HSBC ASIAN VENTURES FUND 3 LIMITED | 33 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| THE HSBC ASIAN VENTURES FUND 2 LIMITED | 28 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SHUI ON LAND LIMITED | 3 | Cayman Islands (KY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK | 100 | Chile (CL) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INVERSIONES S.A. | 100 | Chile (CL) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BEIJING MIYUN HSBC RURAL BANK COMPANY LIMITED | 100 | China (CN) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CHONGQING DAZU HSBC RURAL BANK COMPANY LIMITED | 100 | China (CN) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CHONGQING FENGDU HSBC RURAL BANK COMPANY LIMITED | 100 | China (CN) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DALIAN PULANDIAN HSBC RURAL BANK COMPANY LIMITED | 100 | China (CN) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FUJIAN YONGAN HSBC RURAL BANK COMPANY LIMITED | 100 | China (CN) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GUANGDONG ENPING HSBC RURAL BANK COMPANY LIMITED | 100 | China (CN) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG BANK | 100 | China (CN) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK | 100 | China (CN) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING | 100 | China (CN) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT | 100 | China (CN) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TECHNOLOGY & SERVICES | 100 | China (CN) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HUBEI SUIZHOU CENGDU HSBC RURAL BANK COMPANY LIMITED | 100 | China (CN) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| INDUSTRIAL BANK CO. LTD. | 100 | China (CN) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED | 50 | China (CN) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC JINTRUST FUND MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED | 49 | China (CN) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| NAN HAI HOTEL LIMITED | 25 | China (CN) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BANK OF COMMUNICATIONS CO. LTD. | 19 | China (CN) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PING AN INSURANCE | 17 | China (CN) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BANK OF SHANGHAI | 8 | China (CN) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC COLOMBIA S.A. | 100 | Colombia (CO) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FIDUCIARIA S.A. | 99 | Colombia (CO) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BERMUDA ASIA PACIFIC HOLDINGS LIMITED | 100 | Cook Islands (CK) | 75.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BERMUDA TRUST HOLDINGS | 100 | Cook Islands (CK) | 75.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CASTLEWOOD LIMITED | 100 | Cook Islands (CK) | 75.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FANSHAWE LIMITED | 100 | Cook Islands (CK) | 75.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HENDERSON LIMITED | 100 | Cook Islands (CK) | 75.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TRUSTEE | 100 | Cook Islands (CK) | 75.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MIL PROPERTIES | 100 | Cook Islands (CK) | 75.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PENRHYN SECRETARIES LIMITED | 100 | Cook Islands (CK) | 75.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL FINANCE A.S. | 100 | Czech Republic (CZ) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INVESTMENT COMPANY | 98 | Egypt, Arab Rep. (EG) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK EGYPT S.A.E | 95 | Egypt, Arab Rep. (EG) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES | 95 | Egypt, Arab Rep. (EG) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| APOLLO FINANCE II | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BYRON EQUILIBRE | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| COPARI-SOCIETE DE CONSTRUCTIONS ET DE PARTICIPATIONS IMMOBILIERES | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DELOSFIN S.A. | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DEM 10 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DEM 5 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DEM 6 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DEM 9 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DEMPAR 1 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DEMPAR 2 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DEMPAR 4 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ELYSEES FORMATION | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ELYSEES IMMO INVEST | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ENERSHIP | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ERISA IMMO 1 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ESCOMPTE DE FRANCE S.A. | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| EUROFIN ASSURANCES | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| EUROFIN CAPITAL PARTNERS | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FDM 1 SAS | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FDM 2 SAS | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FDM 3 SAS | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FDM 4 SAS | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FDM 5 SAS | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FDM 6 SAS | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FINANPAR 2 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FINANPAR 4 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FINANPAR 5 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FINANPAR 6 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FINANPAR 7 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FLANDRES CONTENTIEUX S.A. | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FONCIERE ELYSEES SA | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FOREPAR | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GAZ FINANCE | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GIE NORTH BAIL | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GIE VULCAIN ENERGIE | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HALBIS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ASSURANCES IARD | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ASSURANCES VIE | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC COVERED BONDS | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC EPARGNE ENTREPRISE | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FACTORING | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FRANCE | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FRENCH OFFICES 1 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FRENCH OFFICES 2 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FRENCH OFFICES 3 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FRENCH OFFICES 4 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FRENCH OFFICES HOLDINGS | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FRENCH OFFICES HOLDINGS 2 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FRENCH OFFICES HOLDINGS 3 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GLOBAL ASSET MANAGEMENT | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC LEASING | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE BANK FRANCE | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE WEALTH MANAGERS | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC REAL ESTATE LEASING | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC REIM | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| M.M. COGENE 2 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| NEUILLY VALEURS | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| NOBEL | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| OCTOGONE IMMOBILIER | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PROPERTY VISION FRANCE | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| REALIMO NEGOCIATIONS | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| S.A.P.C. - UFIPRO RECOUVREMENT | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF BAIYUN | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF BAOBAB | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF CHANG JIANG | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF CHANG JIANG BA | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF CHANG JIANG ER | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF CHANG JIANG JIU | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF CHANG JIANG LIU | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF CHANG JIANG QI | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF CHANG JIANG SAN | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF CHANG JIANG SHI | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF CHANG JIANG SHI LIU | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF CHANG JIANG SHI WU | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF CHANG JIANG SHIER | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF CHANG JIANG SHIYI | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF CHANG JIANG WU | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF CHANG JIANG YI | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF GUANGZHOU | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF PALISSANDRE | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF ZHU JIANG | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF ZHU JIANG BA | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF ZHU JIANG ER | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF ZHU JIANG JIU | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF ZHU JIANG LIU | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF ZHU JIANG QI | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF ZHU JIANG SAN | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF ZHU JIANG SHI | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF ZHU JIANG SHIYI | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF ZHU JIANG WU | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAF ZHU JIANG YI | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SARL VICTOR HUGO-BAUDRY | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAS FDM 10 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAS FDM 7 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAS FDM 8 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAS FDM 9 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SCI HERVET MATHURINS | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SCI RUE JEAN BRIAUD | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SCI VAUBAN SOLFERINO | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SINOPIA - SOCIETE DE GESTION | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SINOPIA ASSET MANAGEMENT | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SINOPIA FINANCIAL SERVICES | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SNC HOTEL PRIVILEGE | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SNC IMMOBILIERE BAUCHART | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SNCB/M6 - 2008 A | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SNCB/M6-2007 A | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SNCB/M6-2007 B | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SOCIETE DE GESTION ET DEXPERTISE FONCIERE ET FORESTIERE - S.G.E.F.F. | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SOCIETE DEXPANSION ECONOMIQUE ET FINANCIERE | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SOCIETE FINANCIERE ET MOBILIERE | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SOCIETE FRANCAISE ET SUISSE | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SOCIETE IMMOBILIERE MALESHERBES-ANJOU | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SOFIDOM 17 | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SOFIDOM 18 A | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SOFIDOM 18 B | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SOPINGEST | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| THASOSFIN | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| UNION POUR LA GESTION ET LES TRANSACTIONS - U.G.T. | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| VERNET EXPANSION | 100 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ELYSEES RESIDENCE 5 | 99 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SCI NOUVELLE DU 31 AVENUE MONTAIGNE | 96 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SNC NUKU-HIVA BAIL | 80 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ELYSEES FORETS | 75 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SNC LES OLIVIERS DANTIBES | 60 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SCI LES TISSERANDS | 50 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| VALUE FUND 2 | 45 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FINANCIERE DUZES | 34 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| EURO STOCK PICKING | 33 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SPRING RAIN | 28 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GIE GNIFI | 25 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GIE NATHALIE BAIL | 25 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FINANCITÉS | 21 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GIE EDITH BAIL 3 | 20 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GIE EDITH BAIL 4 | 20 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GIE NORMA | 20 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SCI LE CLOS DU VILLAGE | 20 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SCI LES REMPARTS | 20 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SCI VILLA BEAUCLAIR | 20 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DEWAL S.A. | 19 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SERVICES EPARGNE ENTREPRISE | 18 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SOC.DINV POUR LE DEVEL DE LA CONSTRUCTION SA | 14 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GIE LOCAD 08 | 13 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SCI RESIDENCE CLAUS SLUTER | 12 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CERIP - SERVICES BANQUES | 10 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GIE EDITH BAIL 1 | 10 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GIE EDITH BAIL 2 | 10 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SCI CANNES MIDI | 10 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SCI LE HAMEAU DU GOLF | 10 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SCI LES MOULINS | 10 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SOCIETE FINANCIERE DU PMEI | 10 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SOCIETE DE FINANCEMENT DE LECONOMIE FRANCAISE | 9 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CONSORTIUM AUXILIAIRE DE PARTICIPATIONS | 8 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ANTYCIP SA | 7 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GIE LOCAD 07 | 7 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BMS DEVELOPPEMENT | 5 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PRE-IPO INVEST | 5 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| QUADRAL | 5 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SICOVAM HOLDING EX SOPARSICO | 5 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ELIOR SA | 1 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| UNIPOLY SA | 1 | France (FR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK GEORGIA JSC | 70 | Georgia (GE) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CCF CHARTERHOUSE GMBH | 100 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CCF CHARTERHOUSE GMBH & CO ASSET LEASING KG | 100 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DEUTSCHE BÖRSE AG | 100 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ELYSÉES GMBH | 100 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HITG ADMINISTRATION GMBH | 100 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GERMANY HOLDINGS GMBH | 100 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| LIQUIDITATS-KONSORTIALBANK GMBH | 100 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MÜNCHENER HYPOTHEKENBANK EG | 100 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TRINKAUS EUROPA IMMOBILIEN-FONDS NR.10 LUXEMBURG KG | 100 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FUNDING | 99 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DPT DEUTSCHER PENSION TRUST GMBH | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DR. HELFER VERWALTUNGSGEBÄUDE LUXEMBURG KG | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GESELLSCHAFT FUR INDUSTRIELLE BETEILIGUNGEN UND FINANZIERUNG MBH | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GRUNDSTÜCKSGESELLSCHAFT TRINKAUSSTRASSE KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GLOBAL ASSET MANAGEMENT | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INKA INVESTMENT-AG TGV | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TRINKAUS & BURKHARDT AG | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TRINKAUS & BURKHARDT GESELLSCHAFT FUR BANKBETEILIGUNGEN MBH | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TRINKAUS CONSULT GMBH | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TRINKAUS EUROPA IMMOBILIEN-FONDS NR. 5 GMBH | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TRINKAUS FAMILY OFFICE GMBH | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TRINKAUS IMMOBILIEN BETEILIGUNGS KG | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TRINKAUS PRIVATE WEALTH GMBH | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TRINKAUS REAL ESTATE GMBH | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTION SERVICES GMBH | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| INTERNATIONALE KAPITALANLAGEGESELLSCHAFT MBH | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| JOACHIM HECKER GRUNDBESITZ KG | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| T-E-I OBJEKT HANNOVER 2 KG | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TRINKAUS AUSTRALIEN IMMOBILIEN-FONDS NR. 1 TREUHAND-GMBH | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TRINKAUS CANADA IMMOBILIEN-FONDS NR.1 GMBH & CO. KG | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TRINKAUS EUROPA IMMOBILIEN-FONDS NR.3 OBJEKT UTRECHT VERWALTUNGS-GMBH | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TRINKAUS IMMOBILIEN-FONDS GESCHÄFTSFÜHRUNGS-GMBH | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TRINKAUS IMMOBILIEN-FONDS VERWALTUNGS-GMBH | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TRINKAUS PRIVATE EQUITY MANAGEMENT GMBH | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TRINKAUS PRIVATE EQUITY VERWALTUNGS GMBH | 79 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TRINKAUS EUROPA IMMOBILIEN FONDS NR.11 DORTMUND-ESSEN KG | 67 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SINO AG | 21 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BÖRSE DÜSSELDORF AG | 15 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BSU VERMÖGENSVERWALTUNG UNTERNEHMENSBERATUNG GMBH | 15 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TRINKAUS EUROPA IMMOBILIEN-FONDS NR. 6 DÜSSELDORF KG | 15 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TICK TRADING SOFTWARE AG | 14 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DPG DEUTSCHE PERFORMANCEMESSUNGS-GESELLSCHAFT MBH | 8 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TRINKAUS EUROPA IMMOBILIEN-FONDS NR. 4 OBJEKTE BASEL NAUENSTRAßE KG | 8 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DÜSSELDORFER BÖRSENHAUS GMBH | 6 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GBR IHK/RHEINISCH-WESTFÄLISCHE BÖRSE | 6 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SEBA BETEILIGUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH | 4 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TRINKAUS EUROPA IMMOBILIEN-FONDS NR. 7 FRANKFURT MERTONVIERTEL KG | 4 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TRINKAUS EUROPA IMMOBILIEN-FONDS NR. 8 DORTMUND KG | 4 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TRINKAUS EUROPA IMMOBILIEN-FONDS NR. 9 HANNOVER 1 KG | 4 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC NF CHINA REAL ESTATE GMBH & CO.KG | 3 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PARKHAUS WALDTHAUSENPARK GMBH | 2 | Germany (DE) | 57.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PANTELAKIS SECURITIES S.A. | 93 | Greece (GR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC | 73 | Greece (GR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DIAS | 3 | Greece (GR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BANCO NOMINEES | 100 | Guernsey (GG) | 65.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BERMUDA INTERNATIONAL | 100 | Guernsey (GG) | 65.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ETON CORPORATE SERVICES LIMITED | 100 | Guernsey (GG) | 65.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HRMG NOMINEES LIMITED | 100 | Guernsey (GG) | 65.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS | 100 | Guernsey (GG) | 65.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK NOMINEE | 100 | Guernsey (GG) | 65.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CUSTODY SERVICES | 100 | Guernsey (GG) | 65.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GERMAN RETAIL HOLDINGS LIMITED | 100 | Guernsey (GG) | 65.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GERMAN RETAIL PROPERTIES 2 LIMITED | 100 | Guernsey (GG) | 65.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSURANCE MANAGEMENT | 100 | Guernsey (GG) | 65.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSURANCE PCC LIMITED | 100 | Guernsey (GG) | 65.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INVESTMENT HOLDINGS | 100 | Guernsey (GG) | 65.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC MANAGEMENT | 100 | Guernsey (GG) | 65.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE BANK | 100 | Guernsey (GG) | 65.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PROPERTY FUND MANAGEMENT | 100 | Guernsey (GG) | 65.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC REPUBLIC MANAGEMENT SERVICES | 100 | Guernsey (GG) | 65.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES SERVICES | 100 | Guernsey (GG) | 65.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TRUSTEE | 100 | Guernsey (GG) | 65.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MIDLAND BANK TRUSTEE | 100 | Guernsey (GG) | 65.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| REPUBLIC NOMINEES LIMITED | 100 | Guernsey (GG) | 65.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GERMAN RETAIL PROPERTIES 1 LIMITED | 99 | Guernsey (GG) | 65.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC NF CHINA HOLDINGS LIMITED | 50 | Guernsey (GG) | 65.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC NF CHINA INVESTORS LIMITED | 50 | Guernsey (GG) | 65.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BANCO HSBC HONDURAS SOCIEDAD ANONIMA | 94 | Honduras (HN) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BARROWGATE LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FULCHER ENTERPRISES COMPANY LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FULL WEALTH INVESTMENT LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HALBIS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG BANK | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG BANK LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG BULLION COMPANY LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG CREDIT LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG DATA SERVICES LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG FINANCE LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG FINANCIAL INFORMATION LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG FUTURES LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG GENERAL INSURANCE | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG INDEXES COMPANY LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG INVESTMENT SERVICES LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG LIFE LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG SECURITIES LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG SECURITY MANAGEMENT LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HASEBA INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HAYDEN LAKE LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HIGH TIME INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ASIAN VENTURES ADVISERS LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BROKING | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BROKING FOREX | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BROKING FUTURES | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BROKING SECURITIES | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BROKING SERVICES | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CAPITAL LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FINANCE ASIA LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FUTURES HONG KONG LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GLOBAL ASSET MANAGEMENT | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GLOBAL FUND SERVICES LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GUYERZELLER FAR EAST LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSTITUTIONAL TRUST SERVICES | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSURANCE | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSURANCE BROKERS | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INVESTMENT ASIA HOLDINGS LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INVESTMENT BANK ASIA LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INVESTMENT FUNDS | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC LEASING | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC NOMINEES | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE EQUITY | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE TRUSTEE | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PROVIDENT FUND TRUSTEE | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES BROKERS | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES INVESTMENTS | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC STRUCTURED FUNDS | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TRUSTEE | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSI INTERNATIONAL LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| IMENSON LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| LION CORPORATE SERVICES LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| LION MANAGEMENT | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MEGA GAIN RESOURCES LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MIGHTYWAY INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| REPUBLIC BULLION | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SINOPIA ASSET MANAGEMENT | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| THE HONGKONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| THE SINCERE INSURANCE & INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| THE SINCERE LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TIAN TECK LAND LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| WARDLEY LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| WAYFOONG CREDIT LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| WAYFOONG FINANCE LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| WAYFOONG NOMINEES LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| WTL LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| YAN NIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED | 100 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BEAU SOLEIL LIMITED | 85 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TRINKAUS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED | 79 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BROKING NOMINEES | 50 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC MARKETS | 50 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC NF INVESTMENT ADVISERS LIMITED | 50 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| LYNDHOLME LIMITED | 50 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| WAY CHONG FINANCE LIMITED | 50 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GLOBAL PAYMENTS ASIA-PACIFIC LIMITED | 44 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BTHK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LIMITED | 35 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| EPS COMPANY | 35 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| AGIFEL INTERNATIONAL LIMITED | 33 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ARABIAN GULF INVESTMENTS | 33 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES ASIA NOMINEES LIMITED | 25 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ELECTRONIC PAYMENT SERVICES COMPANY | 18 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| THE DEBT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED | 17 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HONG KONG NOTE PRINTING LIMITED | 10 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TRADELINK ELECTRONIC COMMERCE LIMITED | 8 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TRANSUNION LIMITED | 6 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT COUNCIL LIMITED | 4 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BRITCHAM PROPERTY LIMITED | 3 | Hong Kong Sar, China (HK) | 73.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CREDIT FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY | 100 | Hungary (HU) | 47.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC AGENCY | 100 | India (IN) | 52.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ASSET MANAGEMENT | 100 | India (IN) | 52.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING | 100 | India (IN) | 52.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FINANCIAL HOLDINGS | 100 | India (IN) | 52.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC OPERATIONS AND PROCESSING ENTERPRISE | 100 | India (IN) | 52.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRAGATI FINANCE | 100 | India (IN) | 52.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE EQUITY ADVISORS | 100 | India (IN) | 52.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES | 100 | India (IN) | 52.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES AND CAPITAL MARKETS | 100 | India (IN) | 52.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT | 100 | India (IN) | 52.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CONSUMER SERVICES | 99 | India (IN) | 52.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INVESTDIRECT SECURITIES | 94 | India (IN) | 52.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INVESTDIRECT | 93 | India (IN) | 52.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INVESTDIRECT ACADEMY FOR INSURANCE AND FINANCE | 93 | India (IN) | 52.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| INVESTSMART FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED | 93 | India (IN) | 52.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INVESTDIRECT SALES & MARKETING | 42 | India (IN) | 52.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CANARA HSBC ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED | 26 | India (IN) | 52.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| AXIS BANK | 5 | India (IN) | 52.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CREDIT INFORMATION BUREAU | 5 | India (IN) | 52.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| NATIONAL SECURITIES DEPOSITORY LIMITED | 3 | India (IN) | 52.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| AGRICULTURAL FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED | 1 | India (IN) | 52.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PT BANK EKONOMI RAHARJA TBK | 99 | Indonesia (ID) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PT HSBC SECURITIES INDONESIA | 85 | Indonesia (ID) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PT KUSTODIAN SENTRAL EFEK INDONESIA | 6 | Indonesia (ID) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DAR ES SALAAM INVESTMENT BANK | 70 | Iraq (IQ) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BFC INSURANCE | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BFC INSURANCE LIMITED | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BFC IRELAND | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BFC PENSION PLAN | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BFC REINSURANCE LIMITED | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DUBLIN SELF STORAGE LIMITED | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| EUROPEAN RAIL FINANCE HOLDINGS LIMITED | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| EUROPEAN RAIL FINANCE LIMITED | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HFC FINANCIAL SERVICES HOLDINGS | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HFC PENSION PLAN | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FUND ADMINISTRATION | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GLOBAL INVESTOR SERVICES | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSTITUTIONAL TRUST SERVICES | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSURANCE | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC IRELAND | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC LIFE | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PENSION TRUST | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC REINSURANCE LIMITED | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES SERVICES | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES SERVICES HOLDINGS | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSIL PROPERTIES | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SOMERS DUBLIN LIMITED | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TERVISO LIMITED | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| U-STORE-IT | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| U-STORE-IT LIMITED | 100 | Ireland (IE) | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BOBIOM LIMITED | 100 | Isle Of Man (IM) | 64.93 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ERIN FUND MANAGEMENT | 100 | Isle Of Man (IM) | 64.93 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CUSTODY SERVICES | 100 | Isle Of Man (IM) | 64.93 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECRETARIAL SERVICES | 100 | Isle Of Man (IM) | 64.93 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES SERVICES | 100 | Isle Of Man (IM) | 64.93 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TRUSTEE | 100 | Isle Of Man (IM) | 64.93 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SOMERS NOMINEES | 50 | Isle Of Man (IM) | 64.93 | |||||||||||||||||||
| VAULTEX ISLE OF MAN INSURANCE LIMITED | 50 | Isle Of Man (IM) | 64.93 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GLOBAL ASSET MANAGEMENT | 100 | Japan (JP) | 64.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ALLBLACK INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BERMUDA TRUST | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BERMUDA TRUST EXECUTORS | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CHINNERY LIMITED | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK INTERNATIONAL LIMITED | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK MIDDLE EAST LIMITED | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK NOMINEE | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FUND ADMINISTRATION | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FUNDS NOMINEE | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GLOBAL ASSET MANAGEMENT | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PB CORPORATE SERVICES 1 LIMITED | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PB CORPORATE SERVICES 2 LIMITED | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PENSIONS | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRECISION TRADING LIMITED | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE BANKING NOMINEE 1 | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE BANKING NOMINEE 2 | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE BANKING NOMINEE 3 | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TRUSTEE | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| JAMES CAPEL | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| LEMASCO NOMINEES LIMITED | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MIL | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PYDAR CENTRE LIMITED | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAMADA LIMITED | 100 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CHARTERHOUSE BUY-OUT FUND INVESTMENT ADVISERS LIMITED | 98 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BACB | 74 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| OBAN INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 9 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CMH JERSEY LIMITED | 4 | Jersey (JE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| JOINT STOCK COMPANY HSBC SECURITIES KAZAKHSTAN | 100 | Kazakhstan (KZ) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SB HSBC BANK KAZAKHSTAN JSC | 100 | Kazakhstan (KZ) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FUND SERVICES | 93 | Korea, Rep. (KR) | 53.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANA HSBC LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. | 50 | Korea, Rep. (KR) | 53.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BANQUE DE LHABITAT SAL | 100 | Lebanon (LB) | 82.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CCF HOLDING | 100 | Lebanon (LB) | 82.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FINANCIAL SERVICES | 100 | Lebanon (LB) | 82.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SOCIETE CCF FINANCE MOYEN-ORIENT S.A.L. | 100 | Lebanon (LB) | 82.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SOCIETE FINANCIERE DU LIBAN SAL BEIRUT | 2 | Lebanon (LB) | 82.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GUYMONT SERVICES SA | 100 | Liechtenstein (LI) | 81 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC EUROPEAN INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS 3 SARL | 100 | Luxembourg (LU) | 68.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC HOLDINGS LUXEMBOURG S.A. | 100 | Luxembourg (LU) | 68.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INVESTMENT FUNDS | 100 | Luxembourg (LU) | 68.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PARTICIPATIONS | 100 | Luxembourg (LU) | 68.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE BANK | 100 | Luxembourg (LU) | 68.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE BANK MANAGEMENT SERVICES | 100 | Luxembourg (LU) | 68.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PROPERTY INVESTMENT | 100 | Luxembourg (LU) | 68.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LUXEMBOURG | 100 | Luxembourg (LU) | 68.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES SERVICES | 100 | Luxembourg (LU) | 68.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| LGI | 100 | Luxembourg (LU) | 68.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL | 100 | Luxembourg (LU) | 68.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TRINKAUS & BURKHARDT | 79 | Luxembourg (LU) | 68.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TRINKAUS INVESTMENT MANAGERS S.A. | 79 | Luxembourg (LU) | 68.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| COMPAGNIE FINANCIERE DE LA PORTE NEUVE S.A. | 18 | Luxembourg (LU) | 68.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| LUEN FUNG HANG INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED | 100 | Macao Sar, China (MO) | 83.33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC | 100 | Malaysia (MY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC AMANAH MALAYSIA BERHAD | 100 | Malaysia (MY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD | 100 | Malaysia (MY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING | 100 | Malaysia (MY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC NOMINEES | 100 | Malaysia (MY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SALES & SERVICES MALAYSIA SDN BHD | 100 | Malaysia (MY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CORPORATE ADVISORY | 70 | Malaysia (MY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC AMANAH TAKAFUL | 49 | Malaysia (MY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ABM-MCD HOLDINGS SDN BHD | 5 | Malaysia (MY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CAGAMAS BERHAD | 4 | Malaysia (MY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| RATING AGENCY MALAYSIA BERHAD | 4 | Malaysia (MY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| AFC HOLDINGS | 2 | Malaysia (MY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CREDIT GUARANTEE CORPORATION MALAYSIA BERHAD | 1 | Malaysia (MY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GLOBAL MARITIME VENTURES BERHAD | 1 | Malaysia (MY) | 77.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSURANCE MANAGEMENT | 100 | Malta (MT) | 47.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL ADVISERS | 100 | Malta (MT) | 47.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK MALTA P.L.C. | 68 | Malta (MT) | 47.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GLOBAL ASSET MANAGEMENT | 68 | Malta (MT) | 47.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC LIFE ASSURANCE | 68 | Malta (MT) | 47.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES SERVICES | 68 | Malta (MT) | 47.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC STOCKBROKERS | 68 | Malta (MT) | 47.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK | 100 | Mauritius (MU) | 73.93 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC DAISY INVESTMENTS | 100 | Mauritius (MU) | 73.93 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSTITUTIONAL TRUST SERVICES | 100 | Mauritius (MU) | 73.93 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC IRIS INVESTMENTS | 100 | Mauritius (MU) | 73.93 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE EQUITY MANAGEMENT | 100 | Mauritius (MU) | 73.93 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TRUSTEE | 100 | Mauritius (MU) | 73.93 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC VIOLET INVESTMENTS | 100 | Mauritius (MU) | 73.93 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSI | 100 | Mauritius (MU) | 73.93 | |||||||||||||||||||
| EDIFICACIONES PRIME S.A. DE C.V. | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| EL NUEVO PARIS S.A. DE C.V. | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GRUPO FINANCIERO HSBC S. A. DE C. V. | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC AFORE S.A. DE C.V. GRUPO FINANCIERO HSBC | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CASA DE BOLSA S.A. DE C.V. GRUPO FINANCIERO HSBC | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FONDO 1 S.A. DE C.V. SOCIEDAD DE INVERSION DE RENTA VARIABLE | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FONDO 2 S.A. DE C.V. SOCIEDAD DE INVERSION DE RENTA VARIABLE | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FONDO 3 S.A. DE C.V. SOCIEDAD DE INVERSION DE RENTA VARIABLE | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FONDO 4 S.A. DE C.V. SOCIEDAD DE INVERSION DE RENTA VARIABLE | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FONDO 5 S.A. DE C.V. SOCIEDAD DE INVERSION DE RENTA VARIABLE | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FONDO 6 S.A. DE C.V. SOCIEDAD DE INVERSION DE RENTA VARIABLE | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FONDO GLOBAL 1 S.A. DE C.V. SOCIEDAD DE INVERSION DE RENTA VARIABLE | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GLOBAL ASSET MANAGEMENT | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INMOBILIARIA | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC MEXICO S.A. INSTITUCION DE BANCA MULTIPLE GRUPO FINANCIERO HSBC | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PENSIONES S.A. | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SEGUROS S.A DE C.V. GRUPO FINANCIERO HSBC | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SERVICIOS FINANCIEROS S.A. DE C.V | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SERVICIOS S.A. DE C.V. GRUPO FINANCIERO HSBC | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC VIDA S.A. DE C.V | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC-B1 SIEFORE S.A. DE C. V. | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC-B2 SIEFORE S.A. DE C. V. | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC-B3 SIEFORE S.A. DE C.V. | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC-B4 SIEFORE S.A. DE C.V. | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC-B5 SIEFORE S.A. DE C.V. | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC-D1 S.A. DE C.V. SOCIEDAD DE INVERSION EN INSTRUMENTOS DE DEUDA | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC-D2 S.A. DE C.V. SOCIEDAD DE INVERSION EN INSTRUMENTOS DE DEUDA | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC-D7 S.A. DE C.V. SOCIEDAD DE INVERSION EN INSTRUMENTOS DE DEUDA | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC-D9 S.A. DE C.V. SOCIEDAD DE INVERSION EN INSTRUMENTOS DE DEUDA | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC-DA S.A. DE C.V. SOCIEDAD DE INVERSION EN INSTRUMENTOS DE DEUDA | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC-DE S.A. DE C.V. SOCIEDAD DE INVERSION EN INSTRUMENTOS DE DEUDA | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC-DG S. A. DE C. V. SOCIEDAD DE INVERSION EN INSTRUMENTOS DE DEUDA | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC-DH S. A. DE C. V. SOCIEDAD DE INVERSION EN INSTRUMENTOS DE DEUDA | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC-DL S. A. DE C. V. SOCIEDAD DE INVERSION EN INSTRUMENTOS DE DEUDA | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC-E2 S.A. DE C. V. SOCIEDAD DE INVERSION DE RENTA VARIABLE | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC-E3 S.A. DE C.V. SOCIEDAD DE INVERSION DE RENTA VARIABLE | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC-FF S.A. DE C.V. SOCIEDAD DE INVERSION DE RENTA VARIABLE | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC-V2 S.A. DE C.V. SOCIEDAD DE INVERSION DE RENTA VARIABLE | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC-V3 S.A. DE C.V. SOCIEDAD DE INVERSION DE RENTA VARIABLE | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBCD10 S. A. DE C. V. SOCIEDAD DE INVERSION EN INSTRUMENTOS DE DEUDA | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSI HOLDING COMPANY S.A. DE C.V. | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSI MEXICO S.A. DE C.V. | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| INMOBILIARIA BANCI S.A. DE C.V. | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| INMOBILIARIA BANGA S.A. DE C.V. | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| INMOBILIARIA BISA S.A. DE C.V. | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| INMOBILIARIA GBM ATLANTICO S.A. DE C.V. | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| INMOBILIARIA GRUFIN S.A. DE C.V. | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| INMOBILIARIA GUATUSI S.A. DE C.V. | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| INMX COMERCIALIZACION S. A. DE C. V. | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| INMX SERVICIOS S. A. DE C. V. | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| OPERADORA DE HOTELES MAZATLAN S A. DE C.V. | 100 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| INMOBILIARIA BAMO S.A. DE C.V. | 99 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FIANZAS S.A. GRUPO FINANCIERO HSBC | 97 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PROMOTORA LOMA DORADA S.A. DE C.V | 92 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PROMOCION EN BIENES RAICES S.A. DE C.V. | 89 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DESARROLLO TURISTICO S.A. DE C.V. | 82 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MEXICANA DE FOMENTO S.A. DE C.V. | 70 | Mexico (MX) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE BANK | 100 | Monaco (MC) | 74.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PROPERTIES SA | 100 | Monaco (MC) | 74.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ASIA HOLDINGS B.V. | 100 | Netherlands (NL) | 49 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC EUROPE | 100 | Netherlands (NL) | 49 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC HOLDINGS BV | 100 | Netherlands (NL) | 49 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INVESTMENT BANK HOLDINGS BV | 100 | Netherlands (NL) | 49 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC LATIN AMERICA B.V. | 100 | Netherlands (NL) | 49 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC MIDDLE EAST HOLDINGS BV | 100 | Netherlands (NL) | 49 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PROPERTY HOLDINGS | 100 | Netherlands (NL) | 49 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TULIP FUNDING NEDERLAND BV | 100 | Netherlands (NL) | 49 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PROJECT MAPLE II B.V. | 100 | Netherlands (NL) | 49 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC EUROPE B.V. | 97 | Netherlands (NL) | 49 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CFS HOLDINGS BV | 69 | Netherlands (NL) | 49 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CONVENIENCE FOOD SYSTEMS B.V. | 69 | Netherlands (NL) | 49 | |||||||||||||||||||
| AGATHISSIMO | 100 | New Caledonia (NC) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| AGATHISSIMO 2 | 100 | New Caledonia (NC) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SNC TIEBAGOUMENE | 100 | New Caledonia (NC) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAS ORONA | 99 | New Caledonia (NC) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAS BOSQUET- AUDRAIN | 95 | New Caledonia (NC) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SEMA 2I | 3 | New Caledonia (NC) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INTERNATIONAL TRUSTEE | 100 | New Zealand (NZ) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC NOMINEES | 100 | New Zealand (NZ) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| INTERCHANGE AND SETTLEMENT LIMITED | 11 | New Zealand (NZ) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC REPRESENTATIVE OFFICE | 100 | Nigeria (NG) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| C.B.I. PANAMA S.A. | 100 | Panama (PA) | 76.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FINANCIERA FLASH S.A. | 100 | Panama (PA) | 76.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FINANCOMER FACTORING S.A. | 100 | Panama (PA) | 76.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FINANCOMER S.A. | 100 | Panama (PA) | 76.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GESICO INTERNATIONAL SA | 100 | Panama (PA) | 76.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GRUPO FINANCOMER S.A. | 100 | Panama (PA) | 76.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK | 100 | Panama (PA) | 76.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INVESTMENT CORPORATION | 100 | Panama (PA) | 76.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC LEASING S.A. | 100 | Panama (PA) | 76.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES | 100 | Panama (PA) | 76.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SEGUROS | 100 | Panama (PA) | 76.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| INMOBILIARIA BICKFORD S.A | 100 | Panama (PA) | 76.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| POLLINI PROPERTY HOLDINGS INC. | 100 | Panama (PA) | 76.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| VAN DYKE OVERSEAS CORP. | 100 | Panama (PA) | 76.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| WILLIAMSBURG INTERNATIONAL CORP. | 100 | Panama (PA) | 76.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TELERED S.A. | 10 | Panama (PA) | 76.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BANISTMO ASSET MANAGEMENT INC. | 5 | Panama (PA) | 76.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BANISTMO CAPITAL MARKETS GROUP INC. | 5 | Panama (PA) | 76.73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK PARAGUAY S.A. | 100 | Paraguay (PY) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK PERU S.A. | 300 | Peru (PE) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| A SORIANO CORPORATION | 100 | Philippines (PH) | 73.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING | 100 | Philippines (PH) | 73.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FOREX | 100 | Philippines (PH) | 73.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSURANCE BROKERS | 100 | Philippines (PH) | 73.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SAVINGS BANK | 100 | Philippines (PH) | 73.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES | 100 | Philippines (PH) | 73.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PHILIPPINE DEALING SYSTEM HOLDINGS | 100 | Philippines (PH) | 73.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ORTIGAS AND COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | 34 | Philippines (PH) | 73.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PHILIPPINE CLEARING HOUSE CORPORATION | 2 | Philippines (PH) | 73.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK POLSKA S.A. | 100 | Poland (PL) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INVESTMENT SERVICES | 100 | Poland (PL) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CCF ASSET MANAGEMENT RUSSIA | 100 | Russian Federation (RU) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK | 97 | Russian Federation (RU) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HALIFAX LIMITED | 100 | Samoa (WS) | 84.67 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SAUDI ARABIA LIMITED | 76 | Saudi Arabia (SA) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SABB TAKAFUL | 46 | Saudi Arabia (SA) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| THE SAUDI BRITISH BANK | 40 | Saudi Arabia (SA) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HANG SENG ASSET MANAGEMENT PTE LTD | 100 | Singapore (SG) | 70.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC | 100 | Singapore (SG) | 70.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FUND SERVICES | 100 | Singapore (SG) | 70.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FUTURES | 100 | Singapore (SG) | 70.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GLOBAL ASSET MANAGEMENT | 100 | Singapore (SG) | 70.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSTITUTIONAL TRUST SERVICES | 100 | Singapore (SG) | 70.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSURANCE | 100 | Singapore (SG) | 70.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSURANCE BROKERS | 100 | Singapore (SG) | 70.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES | 100 | Singapore (SG) | 70.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES SERVICES | 100 | Singapore (SG) | 70.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TRUSTEE | 100 | Singapore (SG) | 70.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| IL&FS INVESTSMART ASIA PACIFIC PRIVATE LIMITED | 93 | Singapore (SG) | 70.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MONDEX ASIA PTE LTD | 49 | Singapore (SG) | 70.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| OCEAN PROPERTIES PTE LIMITED | 13 | Singapore (SG) | 70.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ASFINCO SINGAPORE LIMITED | 3 | Singapore (SG) | 70.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| EH GROUP LTD | 2 | Singapore (SG) | 70.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INVESTMENT SERVICES | 100 | South Africa (ZA) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES | 100 | South Africa (ZA) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CIRFLEX SA | 62 | Spain (ES) | 33.93 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING LANKA | 100 | Sri Lanka (LK) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INTERNATIONAL NOMINEES LIMITED | 100 | Sri Lanka (LK) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CREDIT INFORMATION BUREAU OF SRI LANKA | 1 | Sri Lanka (LK) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CORDICO MANAGEMENT AG | 100 | Switzerland (CH) | 78.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GUYERZELLER TRUST COMPANY AG | 100 | Switzerland (CH) | 78.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PB SERVICES | 100 | Switzerland (CH) | 78.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE BANK | 100 | Switzerland (CH) | 78.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE BANKING HOLDINGS | 100 | Switzerland (CH) | 78.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SERDAC | 100 | Switzerland (CH) | 78.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SOCIETE IMMOBILIERE ATLAS S.A. | 100 | Switzerland (CH) | 78.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TEMPUS MANAGEMENT AG | 100 | Switzerland (CH) | 78.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| VADEP HOLDING AG | 100 | Switzerland (CH) | 78.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| LAC ASSET MANAGEMENT S.A. | 96 | Switzerland (CH) | 78.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GLOBAL ASSET MANAGEMENT | 89 | Switzerland (CH) | 78.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PROTRUST MANAGEMENT AG | 60 | Switzerland (CH) | 78.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| WINTER FINANZ AG | 40 | Switzerland (CH) | 78.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FACTORS TAIWAN LTD. | 100 | Taiwan (TW) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GLOBAL ASSET MANAGEMENT | 100 | Taiwan (TW) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSURANCE BROKERS | 100 | Taiwan (TW) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES | 100 | Taiwan (TW) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BANQUE DAFFAIRES DE TUNISIE | 10 | Tunisia (TN) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK A.S. | 100 | Turkey (TR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ODEME SISTEMLERI BILGISAYAR TEKNOLOJILERI BASIN YAYIN VE MUSTERI HIZMETLERI | 100 | Turkey (TR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PORTFOY YONETIMI A.S. | 100 | Turkey (TR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC YATIRIM MENKUL DEGERLER A.S. | 100 | Turkey (TR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INTERNET VE TELEKOMUNIKASYON HIZMETLERI ANONIM SIRKETI | 96 | Turkey (TR) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FINANCIAL SERVICES | 100 | United Arab Emirates (AE) | 79.07 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC MIDDLE EAST LEASING PARTNERSHIP | 85 | United Arab Emirates (AE) | 79.07 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC MIDDLE EAST FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED | 80 | United Arab Emirates (AE) | 79.07 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC MIDDLE EAST SECURITIES L.L.C | 49 | United Arab Emirates (AE) | 79.07 | |||||||||||||||||||
| INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS HOLDINGS LIMITED | 195 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BYWEST | 105 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BYWEST LIMITED | 105 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ABLE STORAGE CENTRES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ACCORD ESTATES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ALBOUYS NOMINEES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| AMALIE INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| AMALIE PFI | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| AMP CLIENT HSBC CUSTODY NOMINEE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ANTONY GIBBS TRUSTEES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| APOLLO SELF STORAGE LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ARMADILLO SELF STORAGE LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ASSETFINANCE CITY INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ASSETFINANCE DECEMBER | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ASSETFINANCE JUNE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ASSETFINANCE LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ASSETFINANCE MARCH | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ASSETFINANCE SEPTEMBER | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| B&Q FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BACS PAYMENT SCHEMES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BERMUDA | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BILLINGSGATE CITY SECURITIES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BILLINGSGATE NOMINEES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BRIDE INVESTMENTS | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BROKER DIRECT PLC | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BY CHELMER | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BY CHELMER PLC | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BY NOM LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| C P E INVESTMENTS NO 1 LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CANADA CRESCENT NOMINEES | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CANADA SQUARE NOMINEES | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CANADA WATER NOMINEES | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CCF CHARTERHOUSE LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CENTRAL GARAGE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CHANTAL TWO LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CHARTERHOUSE ADMINISTRATORS | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CHARTERHOUSE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CHARTERHOUSE FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CHARTERHOUSE INCOME CARRY SLP LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CHARTERHOUSE MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CHARTERHOUSE PENSIONS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CHARTERHOUSE PROPERTY GENERAL PARTNER | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CHARTERHOUSE PROPERTY NOMINEES | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CHARTERHOUSE PROPERTY SPECIAL LP LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CHARTERHOUSE RETAIL PROPERTY SPECIAL LP LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CHARTERHOUSE SECURITIES HOLDINGS | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CL ADMINISTRATION | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CL ADMINISTRATION LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CL RESIDENTIAL LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| COWSLIP ESTATES | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CREST NICHOLSON HOLDINGS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CREWFLEET LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CRITERION HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CRITERION HEALTHCARE PLC | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CROMWELL LAND DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CROMWELL LAND FINANCE LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CROMWELL LAND INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CROMWELL LAND LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CROMWELL LAND MANAGEMENT LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CROWN VEHICLE CONTRACTS PLC | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CVL LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| D.L.R.S. LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DERBY PARTICIPATIONS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DEVELOPING COUNTRIES INVESTMENT LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DRAYTON CORPORATION | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ELMBRIDGE COURT | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| EMTT LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ENCORE PROPERTIES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ENCORE PROPERTIES NOMINEE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ENDEAVOUR PERSONAL FINANCE LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| EQUATOR HOLDINGS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| EUROPEAN RAIL FINANCE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| EVERSHOLT RAIL | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| EVERSHOLT RAIL HOLDINGS | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FIRST DIRECT INVESTMENTS | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FORWARD TRUST LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FORWARD TRUST MOTOR FINANCE LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FORWARD TRUST PERSONAL FINANCE LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FORWARD TRUST RAIL SERVICES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FTG LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FUND NOMINEES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| G.M. GILT-EDGED NOMINEES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GIBBS GULF INSURANCE CONSULTANTS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GREENWELL NOMINEES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GRENDON SECURITIES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GRIFFIN CREDIT SERVICES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GRIFFIN INTERNATIONAL LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HALBIS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HAMILTON FINANCIAL PLANNING SERVICES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HARTLEY COOPER & WARNER LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HBL NOMINEES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HEAREF BLOOM HOLDINGS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HEAREF BLOOM NOMINEE NO 1 LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HEAREF BLOOM NOMINEE NO 2 LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HEAREF SHERWOOD HOLDINGS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HEAREF SHERWOOD NOMINEE NO 1 LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HEAREF SHERWOOD NOMINEE NO 2 LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HFC BANK LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HFC PENSION PLAN LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HILAGA INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOLMWOODS TERMTIME CREDIT LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HONGKONG INTERNATIONAL TRADE FINANCE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD COMPUTER SERVICES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD FINANCE LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD FUNDING PLC | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD INTERNATIONAL EUROPE LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD LEASING LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD OVERSEAS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ASIA HOLDINGS | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ASIA PACIFIC HOLDINGS | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ASSET FINANCE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ASSET FINANCE M.O.G. HOLDINGS | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK PENSION TRUST | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK PLC | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BRANCH NOMINEE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CANADA HOLDINGS | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CAPITAL FINANCING HOLDINGS | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CAPITAL FUNDING 1 | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CITY FUNDING HOLDINGS | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CLIENT HOLDINGS NOMINEE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CLIENT SHARE OFFER NOMINEE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CORPORATE TRUSTEE COMPANY | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ENTERPRISE INVESTMENT COMPANY | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE FUND GP LTD | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC EQUATOR | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC EQUIPMENT FINANCE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC EQUITY | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC EQUITY NOMINEE NUMBER 33 | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC EQUITY NOMINEE NUMBER 34 | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC EQUITY NOMINEE NUMBER 35 | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC EQUITY NOMINEE NUMBER 65 | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC EUROPEAN ACTIVE REAL ESTATE FUND NOMINEE LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC EUROPEAN ACTIVE REAL ESTATE FUND TRUSTEE LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC EUROPEAN ACTIVE REAL ESTATE GENERAL PARTNER LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC EUROPEAN CLIENTS DEPOSITARY RECEIPTS NOMINEE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC EXECUTOR & TRUSTEE COMPANY | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FINANCE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FINANCE LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FINANCE TRANSFORMATION | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FUNDING SERVICES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GENERAL INSURANCE SERVICES | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GIBBS | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GIBBS ACTUARIAL & ADVISORY SERVICES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GIBBS CONSULTING LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GIBBS INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GLOBAL ASSET MANAGEMENT | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GLOBAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GLOBAL CUSTODY NOMINEE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GLOBAL CUSTODY TCI NOMINEE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GLOBAL RESOURCING | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GROUP NOMINEES UK LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC IM PENSION TRUST LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INDOCHINA INVESTMENTS GP LTD | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INFRASTRUCTURE FUND MANAGEMENT LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSURANCE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSURANCE BROKERS HOLDINGS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSURANCE HOLDINGS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSURANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSURANCE SERVICES | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INTERMEDIATE LEASING | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL ADVISERS | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL SERVICES | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INTERNATIONAL TRADE FINANCE LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INVESTMENT BANK HOLDINGS PLC | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INVESTMENT RESIDUARY LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INVOICE FINANCE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ISSUER SERVICES COMMON DEPOSITARY NOMINEE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ISSUER SERVICES DEPOSITARY NOMINEE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC LATIN AMERICA HOLDINGS | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC LIFE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC LODGE FUNDING | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC LONDON HOLDINGS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC MARKING NAME NOMINEE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC OVERSEAS HOLDINGS | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC OVERSEAS INVESTMENTS | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC OVERSEAS NOMINEE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PLC | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PREFERENTIAL LP | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE BANK | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE EQUITY EUROPEAN | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE EQUITY INVESTMENTS | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE TRUSTEE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PROPERTY | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PROPERTY FUNDS | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PROPERTY FUNDS INVESTMENT LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC QUEST TRUSTEE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC RAIL | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC RETIREMENT BENEFITS TRUSTEE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ROSE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC ROSE FUNDING | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES SERVICES | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SHIPPING SERVICES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SOC LLOYDS CLIENTS NOMINEE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SPECIALIST FUND MANAGEMENT LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SPECIALIST INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SPMS NOMINEE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC STOCKBROKER SERVICES | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC STOCKBROKERS NOMINEE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TRUST COMPANY | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TULIP | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TULIP FUNDING | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TULIP HOLDINGS | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC VEHICLE FINANCE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC VEHICLE SERVICES | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC VENTURES | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC VINTNERS PLACE LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSI ACTIVE PROPERTY FUND NOMINEE LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSI ACTIVE PROPERTY FUND TRUSTEE LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSIL | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSIL INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSIL PROPERTIES | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ICB SECURITIES 1 LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ICB SECURITIES 2 UNLIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS GENERAL PARTNER LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| INVERARAY INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| JAMES CAPEL | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| JAMES CAPEL & CO. LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| JAMES CAPEL HOLDINGS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| JAMES CAPEL INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| JAMES CAPEL SERVICES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| JOHN LEWIS FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| JUNGHEINRICH LEASING LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| KEYSER ULLMANN LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| LAW 2313 LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| LAWINSURE LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| LEGEND ESTATES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| LGA TRUSTEES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MAGIM CLIENT HSBC GIS NOMINEE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MARKS AND SPENCER FINANCIAL SERVICES PLC | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MARKS AND SPENCER LIFE ASSURANCE LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MARKS AND SPENCER RETAIL FINANCIAL SERVICES HOLDINGS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MARKS AND SPENCER SAVINGS AND INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MARKS AND SPENCER UNIT TRUST MANAGEMENT LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MATLODGE LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MERCANTILE COMPANY LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| METROPOLITAN COLLECTION SERVICES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MIDCORP LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MIDLAND BANK | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MIDLAND BANK INSURANCE SERVICES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MIDLAND INTERNATIONAL TRADE SERVICES | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MIDLAND NOMINEES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MONTAGU TRUST LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MORACREST INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MOTOLEASE LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MYRAYARN LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| NESSDALE LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| NHFA LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PATERNOSTER HEAREF GP LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PATERNOSTER PARTNERS 2 LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PATERNOSTER PARTNERS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PETERBOROUGH HOSPITAL INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PETERBOROUGH HOSPITAL LP CO. | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PROJECT EQUITY CARRIED INTEREST M P LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PROPERTY VISION HOLDINGS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PROPERTY VISION LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PRUDENTIAL CLIENT HSBC GIS NOMINEE | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PYDAR CENTRE 2 LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SALFORD PARTICIPATIONS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAMUEL MONTAGU & CO | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAMUEL MONTAGU & CO. LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAMUEL MONTAGU HOLDINGS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SHENFIELD NOMINEES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SHIELD PROPERTIES & INVESTMENTS | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SHIELD PROPERTIES & INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SHUTTLE DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SINOPIA ASSET MANAGEMENT | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SOMERS | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SOUTH EAST PARTICIPATIONS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SOUTH YORKSHIRE LIGHT RAIL LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SPEEDCALM LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ST CROSS TRUSTEES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| STERLING CREDIT LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| STOCKWATCH LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SWAN NATIONAL LEASING | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SWAN NATIONAL LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SWORDHEATH PROPERTIES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| THE LONDON MORTGAGE TRUST LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| THE VENTURE CATALYSTS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TKM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TKM LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TRIALDEAN LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TURNSONIC | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| URBAN SOLUTIONS | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| VICARAGE FIELDS | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| VODAFONE UK INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| WUTM NOMINEES LIMITED | 100 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BYCENTRAL HOLDINGS LIMITED | 97 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BYCENTRAL LIMITED | 97 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| AGP | 95 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| AGP HOLDINGS | 95 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ANNES GATE PROPERTY PLC | 95 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ENTERPRISE CIVIC BUILDINGS | 90 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ENTERPRISE CIVIC BUILDINGS LIMITED | 90 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ENTERPRISE EDUCATION CONWY LIMITED | 90 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ENTERPRISE EDUCATION HOLDINGS CONWY LIMITED | 90 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ENTERPRISE HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LIMITED | 90 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ENTERPRISE HEALTHCARE LIMITED | 90 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BOUYGUES PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATION AND COMMUNITY | 85 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BYNORTH | 85 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BYNORTH LIMITED | 85 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SUSSEX CUSTODIAL SERVICES | 82 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SUSSEX CUSTODIAL SERVICES LIMITED | 82 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MCRP GENERAL PARTNER LIMITED | 75 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| WALTHAM FOREST LOCAL EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP LIMITED | 68 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BY EDUCATION | 65 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS LIMITED | 55 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LIMITED | 55 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| RMPA HOLDINGS LIMITED | 55 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| RMPA NOMINEES LIMITED | 55 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| RMPA SERVICES PLC | 55 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CORSAIR PROPERTIES LIMITED | 50 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOLMWOODS | 50 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOLMWOODS GROUP LIMITED | 50 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOLMWOODS INSURANCE GROUP MANAGEMENT LIMITED | 50 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOLMWOODS INSURANCE SERVICES LIMITED | 50 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOLMWOODS LIFE & PENSIONS LIMITED | 50 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOLMWOODS UNDERWRITING AGENCY LIMITED | 50 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FUNDING | 50 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC NF CHINA SLP LIMITED | 50 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MIDSUMMER LODGE INVESTMENTS | 50 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SAMUEL MONTAGU INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS | 50 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| URBAN SOLUTIONS CARDIFF HOLDINGS LIMITED | 50 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| URBAN SOLUTIONS GREENWICH HOLDINGS LIMITED | 50 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| VAULTEX UK LIMITED | 50 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BRITISH ARAB COMMERCIAL BANK PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY | 49 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FOINAVON LIMITED | 45 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PARADIGM | 40 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SHEFFIELD LEP LIMITED | 40 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MANDARIN 1 LIMITED | 33 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CALEY SPV LIMITED | 23 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MONTAGU HOLDINGS LIMITED | 20 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MOTABILITY OPERATIONS GROUP PLC | 20 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SECURECOMS LIMITED | 20 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| LAFARGE FINANCE LIMITED | 17 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CCF & PARTNERS ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED | 15 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| VOCALINK HOLDINGS LIMITED | 15 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CITY OF LONDON HELIPORT LIMITED | 11 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CHEQUE AND CREDIT CLEARING COMPANY LIMITED | 8 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HCM HOLDINGS LIMITED | 8 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| EFT-POS UK LIMITED | 7 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CHAPS CLEARING COMPANY LIMITED | 6 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| EUROCLEAR PLC | 6 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TEMDAL | 5 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| UK PAYMENTS ADMINISTRATION LIMITED | 4 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| EMPLOYMENT CONDITIONS ABROAD LIMITED | 3 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FXNET LIMITED | 3 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MARKIT GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED | 3 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CLS UK INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS LTD. | 2 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| LCH.CLEARNET GROUP LIMITED | 1 | United Kingdom (GB) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FINANCIAL SERVICES | 100 | Uruguay (UY) | 78.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK | 90 | Uruguay (UY) | 78.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL MASSACHUSETTS INC. | 500 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| AHLIC INVESTMENT HOLDINGS CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BEAVER VALLEY INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENCHARGE CREDIT SERVICE HOLDING COMPANY | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL COMMERCIAL CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL COMMERCIAL HOLDING CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL COMPANY LLC | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL CONNECTICUT INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL CREDIT SERVICES INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL CREDIT SERVICES OF CONNECTICUT INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL CREDIT SERVICES OF MISSISSIPPI INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL CREDIT SERVICES OF SOUTH CAROLINA INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL FINANCE CO. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL FINANCIAL II LLC | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL FRANCHISE COMPANY INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL HOMEOWNER SERVICE CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL INVESTMENT CO. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL KENTUCKY INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL LEASING GROUP INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL LOAN & THRIFT CO. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL LOUISIANA INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL MAINE INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL MICHIGAN INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL NEW HAMPSHIRE INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL OREGON INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL REAL ESTATE JOINT VENTURES INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL RHODE ISLAND INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL SOUTH DAKOTA INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BMC HOLDING COMPANY | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CABOT PARK HOLDINGS INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CARD-FLO #1 INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CARD-FLO #3 INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CC&H HOLDINGS LLC | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DELAWARE SECURITIES PROCESSING CORP. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| EIGHTH HFC LEASING CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| F-STREET HOLDINGS INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FIFTH HFC LEASING CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FOURTEENTH HFC LEASING CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FOURTH HFC LEASING CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GWML HOLDINGS INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HFC COMMERCIAL REALTY INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HFC COMPANY LLC | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HFC FINANCIAL I LLC | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HFC FINANCIAL II LLC | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HFC LEASING INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HFTA CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD CAPITAL MARKETS LLC | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD COMMERCIAL FINANCIAL SERVICES INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER LOAN CORPORATION II | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION II | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION III | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION OF CALIFORNIA | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION OF NEVADA | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD FINANCE REALTY CORPORATION OF NEVADA | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD FINANCE REALTY CORPORATION OF NEW YORK | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD GLOBAL FUNDING INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD INDUSTRIAL FINANCE COMPANY | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD INSURANCE GROUP INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD INVESTMENT FUNDING INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD IRELAND HOLDINGS INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF DELAWARE | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD REALTY CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD RECOVERY SERVICES CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD SERVICING INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC - GR CORP. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC AFFINITY CORPORATION I | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC AMERICAS CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC AUTO ACCOUNTS INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC AUTO CREDIT INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BRIDGETOWN INVESTMENTS | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BUSINESS CREDIT | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CAPITAL | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC COLUMBIA FUNDING LLC | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CONSUMER LENDING | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CREDIT CENTER INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FINANCE CAPITAL TRUST IX | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FINANCE CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC FUNDING | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GRAMERCY FUNDING LLC | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC HOME EQUITY LOAN CORPORATION II | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSURANCE AGENCY | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INSURANCE COMPANY OF DELAWARE | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENTS CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INVESTMENT CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC JADE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC LOGAN HOLDINGS USA LLC | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC MARKETS | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC MCKINLEY FINANCE LLC | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC MORTGAGE CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC MORTGAGE SERVICES INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC MORTGAGE SERVICES WAREHOUSE LENDING INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC NORTH AMERICA CAPITAL TRUST I | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC NORTH AMERICA INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC OVERSEAS CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC OVERSEAS INVESTMENTS CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PAY SERVICES INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC RANIER INVESTMENTS LLC | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC REALTY CREDIT CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC RECEIVABLES ACQUISITION COMPANY I | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC RECEIVABLES ACQUISITION CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC RECEIVABLES FUNDING INC. I | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC RETAIL SERVICES INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TECHNOLOGY & SERVICES | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC USA CAPITAL TRUST I | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC USA CAPITAL TRUST II | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC USA CAPITAL TRUST III | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC USA CAPITAL TRUST V | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC USA CAPITAL TRUST VI | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC USA CAPITAL TRUST VII | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC WHITNEY FINANCE LLC | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSI ASSET SECURITIZATION CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HULL 752 CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HULL 753 CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| METRIS RECEIVABLES INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MORTGAGE ONE CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MORTGAGE TWO CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MTX LLC | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| NEIL CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| NINETEENTH HFC LEASING CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| NORTHRIDGE PLAZA INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PALATINE HILLS LEASING INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PHL ONE INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PROPERTY OWNER | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| R/CLIP CORP. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SILLIMAN CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SIXTH HFC LEASING CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| THIRTEENTH HFC LEASING CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| WASCO PROPERTIES INC. | 100 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC RECEIVABLES FUNDING INC. II | 99 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL FLORIDA INC. | 98 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD TAX MASTERS ACQUISITION CORPORATION | 98 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TAXPAYER FINANCIAL SERVICES INC. | 98 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SPE 1 2005 MANAGER INC. | 98 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SPE 1 MANAGER INC. | 98 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TFS I 2005 LLC | 97 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TFS I LLC | 97 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD SERVICING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | 91 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CARD SERVICES INC. | 91 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GPIF CO-INVESTMENT LLC | 80 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BURTS BEES INC. | 65 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| COMPRESSION POLYMERS HOLDING I LP | 48 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| VYCOM CORP | 48 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HCO HOLDING I CORPORATION | 47 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HENRY COMPANY | 47 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| QZ ACQUISITION USA INC. | 36 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| NANOSTREAM INC. | 28 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TFS II 2005 LLC | 19 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TFS II LLC | 19 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CARD SERVICES | 7 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GREAT AMERICAN ACCESSORIES INC. | 2 | Usa (Delaware) (USDE) | 78.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
| B.I.G. INSURANCE AGENCY INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BEACHHOUSE PROPERTIES INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL DIRECT INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL FINANCIAL I INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL NEW YORK INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL TENNESSEE INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL WEST VIRGINIA INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BENEFICIAL WYOMING INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BFC INSURANCE AGENCY OF NEVADA | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CAL-PACIFIC SERVICES INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CAPCO/COVE INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CBS/HOLDINGS INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CROSS ZOU HOLDING CORP. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CROSS-LA REALTY INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CROSSTURKEY INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DECISION ONE MORTGAGE COMPANY LLC | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| EAGLE ROCK HOLDINGS INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ELLENVILLE HOLDINGS INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| FIRST CENTRAL NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| GILLER LTD. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HALBIS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HARBOUR ISLAND INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HFC AGENCY OF MISSOURI INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HFS INVESTMENTS INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HIGH MEADOW MANAGEMENT INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HONG KONG INTERNATIONAL TRADE FINANCE | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD COMMERCIAL OF CALIFORNIA INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION OF ALABAMA | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION OF WEST VIRGINIA | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD FINANCE INDUSTRIAL LOAN COMPANY | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD FINANCE INDUSTRIAL LOAN COMPANY OF IOWA | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD FINANCIAL CENTER INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD INDUSTRIAL LOAN COMPANY OF KENTUCKY | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD INSURANCE AGENCY INC. NEVADA | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD INSURANCE GROUP HOLDING COMPANY | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD LIFE INSURANCE CO. OF ARIZONA | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEHOLD POOLING CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HOUSEKEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC AFS | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC AUTO FINANCE INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC AUTO RECEIVABLES CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK NEVADA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK USA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC DIAMOND TRUST | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GLOBAL ASSET MANAGEMENT | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC GRAMERCY FUNDING LLC | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC INVESTMENTS | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC MOTOR CREDIT | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC PRIVATE BANK INTERNATIONAL | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC REINSURANCE | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC RETAIL CREDIT | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC SECURITIES SERVICES | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TECHNOLOGIES INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC TRUST COMPANY | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC USA INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| KATONAH CLOSE CORP. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MACRAY CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MM MOORING #2 CORP. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| OAKWOOD HOLDINGS INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| ONE MAIN STREET INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PARGEN CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PHL FOUR INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PHL THREE INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| RAPAL ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| RENAISSANCE BANKCARD SERVICES OF KENTUCKY | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| REPUBLIC NEW YORK SECURITIES CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| REPUBLIC OVERSEAS CAPITAL CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SERVICE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SILLIMAN ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SOUTHWEST TEXAS GENERAL AGENCY INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SUB 1-211 INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SUB 2-211 INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| THIRD HFC LEASING CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TIMBERLINK SETTLEMENT SERVICES | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TOWER HOLDING NEW YORK CORP. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TOWER L.I.C. CORP. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TOWER PIERREPONT CORP. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TPBC ACQUISITION CORP. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TRUMBALL MANAGEMENT INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| VALLEY PROPERTIES CORPORATION | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| XDP INC. | 100 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| LAPAR ASSOCIATES LMITED PARTNERSHIP | 99 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC LAND TITLE AGENCY | 55 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| DB ARTEMIS INVESTMENTS GP | 49 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| COMPRESSION POLYMERS CORP. | 48 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC CAPITAL CANADA ROCKLAND HOLDING CO. | 40 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CHATTANOOGA VALLEY ASSOCIATES | 33 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CHATTANOOGA VALLEY CORPORATION | 33 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| KII HOLDING CORPORATION | 28 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| KRANSON INDUSTRIES | 28 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SPARKICE.COM INC. | 11 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| NUHEAT INC. | 6 | Usa (Not Delaware) (US) | 44.53 | |||||||||||||||||||
| HSBC BANK | 100 | Vietnam (VN) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| S.W.I.F.T. | 100 | Vietnam (VN) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| VIETNAM TECHNOLOGICAL AND COMMERCIAL JOINT STOCK BANK | 20 | Vietnam (VN) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BAO VIET HOLDINGS | 9 | Vietnam (VN) | 0 |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)