By Michelle Conlin and Peter Rudegeair
June 14
(Reuters) - Six former Bank of America Corp employees have alleged
that the bank deliberately denied eligible home owners loan
modifications and lied to them about the status of their mortgage
payments and documents.
The bank allegedly used
these tactics to shepherd homeowners into foreclosure, as well as
in-house loan modifications. Both yielded the bank more profits than
the government-sponsored Home Affordable Modification Program,
according to documents recently filed as part of a lawsuit in
Massachusetts federal court.
The former
employees, who worked at Bank of America centers throughout the United
States, said the bank rewarded customer service representatives who
foreclosed on homes with cash bonuses and gift cards to retail stores
such as Target Corp and Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.
For
example, an employee who placed 10 or more accounts into foreclosure a
month could get a $500 bonus. At the same time, the bank punished
those who did not make the numbers or objected to its tactics with
discipline, including firing.
About twice a
month, the bank cleaned out its HAMP backlog in an operation called
"blitz," where it declined thousands of loan modification requests just
because the documents were more than 60 months old, the court
documents say.
The testimony from the former
employees also alleges the bank falsified information it gave the
government, saying it had given out HAMP loan modifications when it had
not.
Rick Simon, a Bank of America Home Loans
spokesman, said the bank had successfully completed more modifications
than any other servicer under HAMP.
"We continue
to demonstrate our commitment to assisting customers who are at risk
of foreclosure and, at best, these attorneys are painting a false
picture of the bank's practices and the dedication of our employees,"
Simon said in a email, adding the declarations were "rife with factual
inaccuracies."
Borrowers filed the civil case
against Bank of America in 2010 and are now seeking class
certification. The affidavits, dated June 7, are the latest accusations
over the mishandling of mortgage modifications by some top U.S. banks.
Mortgage
problems have dogged Bank of America since its disastrous purchase of
Countrywide Financial in 2008. The bank paid $42 billion to settle
credit crisis and mortgage-related litigation between 2010 and 2012,
according to SNL Financial.
Bank of America and
four other banks reached a $25 billion landmark settlement with
regulators in 2012, following a scandal in late 2010 when it was
revealed employees "robo signed" documents without verifying them as is
required by law.
But problems have persisted.
Since 2012, more than 18,000 homeowners have filed complaints about
Bank of America with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a new
agency created to help protect consumers. Recently, the attorney
generals of New York and Florida accused Bank of America of violating
the terms of last year's settlement.
The
government created HAMP in 2009 in response to the foreclosure epidemic
and to encourage banks to give homeowners loan modifications, allowing
some borrowers to stay in their homes.
THE BLITZ
The
court documents paint a picture of customer service operations where
managers roamed the floor with headsets, able to listen into any call
without warning. Service representatives were told to lie to
homeowners, telling them their paperwork and payments had not been
received, when in reality they had.
"This is
exactly what's been happening to homeowners for years," said Danielle
Kelley, a foreclosure defense lawyer in Florida. "No matter how many
times they send in their paperwork, or how often they make their
payments, they simply can't get loan modifications. They wind up in
foreclosure instead."
The former employees said
they were told to falsify electronic records and string homeowners
along in foreclosure as long as possible. The problem was exacerbated
because the bank did not have enough employees handling modifications,
adding to the backlog of cases purged during the "blitz" operations.
Once
a HAMP application was delayed or rejected, Bank of America would
offer an in-house alternative, charging as high as 5 percent when the
loan could have been modified for 2 percent under HAMP, according to an
affidavit by William Wilson, who worked at the bank's Charlotte, North
Carolina office.
Wilson, who was a case
management team manager, said he told his supervisors the practices
were "ridiculous" and "immoral." He said he was fired in August 2012.
Bank of America said it was not at liberty to discuss personnel matters.
No comments:
Post a Comment